WaPo’s Comfort Women Ad
Posted by ampontan on Friday, June 15, 2007
GI Korea is reporting on his ROK Drop blog that a group of “Japanese lawmakers” has taken out a full-page ad in the Washington Post stating that “no historical document has ever been found” proving the direct involvement of the Japanese government and military in conscripting comfort women.
Reader Infimum tipped us off that Occidentalism has a large copy of the full page ad itself, with the names of those signing it, here. It’s still a little difficult to read, but you can probably find ways to magnify it. Of interest is that several members of the primary opposition group, the Democratic Party of Japan, also endorsed it. Another prominent name on the document is that of Yoshiko Sakurai, a journalist who was the main anchor on Kyo no Dekigoto, a national news program that ran at roughly 11:00 p.m. for more than 50 years until September last year.
Of even greater interest is that the ad provides the URL for a 20-page article (.pdf file) by Prof. Ikuhiko Hata titled No Organized or Forced Recruitment.
This is worth reading for anyone who has an open mind on the issue. It reveals, for example, that Mike Honda, the sponsor of the House resolution, was also instrumental in the passage of the Hayden Act in the California state legislature. This act allowed parties to sue Japanese companies for “war crimes” a half-century after the fact, demonstrating that the state remains a fount of unctuous and self-righteous political vapidity. The Supreme Court mercifully struck it down as unconstitutional.
Prof. Hata also references the six (!) contradictory stories given by Lee Yong-soo, one of the three former comfort women who gave testimony to the House subcommittee. Two were Korean; neither were coerced by the Japanese. The third was a Dutch national from Indonesia, and Hata reports that a Japanese officer shut down the brothel and freed the women when he discovered its existence. Also, a Dutch military court tried and convicted 11 people in connection with the incident, executing one. Hata uses this incident to demonstrate that the Japanese military did not countenance coercion as a policy, and that the matter in question was legally dealt with years ago.
Commentary
I agree with GIK when he says the ad is not going to change anyone’s mind; the time for this sort of action was when the issue first erupted a few months ago. He also makes a point I’ve made several times here and elsewhere over the past couple of years, not only about the comfort women in particular, but the war in general:
Prime Minister Abe could apologize for everything from the comfort women issue and the Nanjing Massacre to the Hideyoshi invasions of Korea starting in 1592 and the Japanese piracy of Shilla and Tang dynasty shipping even before then, followed by committing seppuku on top of Namsan mountain in Seoul…and it would still not be enough for these governments because (the issue) provides them with a great domestic political weapon to disguise their own…failures by encouraging anti-Japanese sentiment.
On the other hand, I disagree partly with his proposed solution: a speech by Prime Minister Abe.
…(t)o atone for its past sins, (Japan) would become a champion of women’s rights, beginning with the plight of modern day sexual slavery of North Korean women in China that both the South Korean and Chinese governments choose to ignore. Then announce that Japan would…start accepting North Korean defectors into Japan and become an outspoken advocate of NK defectors, unlike South Korea.
This isn’t a bad idea on the face of it, but one problem with the suggestion is that it would perpetuate the false concept of “women’s rights”. There is no such thing as “women’s rights” or “children’s rights” or “gay rights”, or anything of the sort. Rights are absolute; it is not possible for any group to have its own exclusive collection. An examination of the rights claimed as exclusive would reveal that they either are the same rights possessed by everyone else, or else not really rights at all.
Another problem is that the speech would likely be ignored. Most of the world’s media (which is the real audience here) already overlooks the whaling carried out by such countries as Norway and Iceland to concentrate on Japan’s fleet, for example. In the same way, those in the civil rights profession in the West tend to ignore the contemporary slave trade still conducted in Africa, with other Africans or Arabs as the slaveholders.
Besides, the motivation of the people such a speech would rebut has little, if anything, to do with the surviving comfort women themselves. It was concisely described by Thomas Sowell in the subtitle of his book, The Vision of the Anointed: “Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy”
The real motivation is to see themselves as superior people. This requires inferior, “bad”, non-progressive people to whom they can be favorably compared. It also affords the anointed a turn on the public stage to demonstrate their superiority.
You think not? Pick up any newspaper–you’ll find dozens of examples, none of which has anything to do with comfort women.
bender said
If this be true about the Japanese lawmakers, it’s a really bad move…sadly to say. This is because the issue is NOT whether the Japanese government/military was directly involved in the recruitment of prostitutes, but whether the government/military set up brothels with lots of colonial subject people working in them. I’m not saying that this issue is right/correct, or that any country is clean-handed enough to criticize Japan, but the issue is what it is (at least what I discern from the English language media and the sorts), and this will just make Japan’s already hurt image look badder.
I’ve read “Have your say” in the BBC web about how readers think about the thawing relationship between China and Japan, and it’s amazing how many people assert that Japan never aplogized or never paid any compensations for the war, which are both utterly false. But the Japanese people need to realize that the haters/bashers around them are always wanting to make Japan look unaplogetic, and the way Mr. Abe or the lawmakers here are dealing with the issue seem only to help Japan look like that, which is exactly what Japan-bashers want to have happening. So I rather think Mr. Murayama’s stance was not as bad as Sankei and the Yomiuri say it to be.
infimum said
Occidentalism has an enlarged copy.
Jon said
Although it is debated how much Japan truly has attoned for the war, I am of the opinion that the bloody war ended over 60 years ago and I am tired of hearing about China and Korea complaining about it. They really need to get over it already. And the Chinese communists bloody history means they have nothing to say.
GI Korea said
Ampontan,
You are right that the speech would largely ignored if given in lets say Japan. However, if PM Abe had given such a speech during his recent visit to the US it would have gotten I think a lot of notice since the comfort women issue was a hot media topic at the time.
As far as “women’s rights”, I guess “human rights” would be a more accurate term but Japan should seriously think about becoming a champion of such rights of NK defectors and speaking out against sexual slavery of NK women. By doing so puts the Koreans and the Chinese on the defensive over their own moral failings that are happening right now compared to Japan’s moral failings 60 years ago.
Japan Lawmakers Take Out Full Page Ad on Comfort Women at ROK Drop said
[…] of debate. You can read a whole lot more on this development over at the Marmot’s Hole, Ampontan, and Occidentalism. Occidentalism has a blown up version of the ad that you can read […]
Liberal Japan » Blog Archive » Kininaru and O-kiniiri News said
[…] Ad about comfort women in the Washington Post, Occidentalism; Matt@O has published the entire ad. Interesting. – Ampontan comments on this here. […]
Jing said
I’d like to hear your opinion on the comfort women issue Ampontan. Something more tangential than the torrent of disingenuity in this post. One scents the distinct odor of intellectual cowardice, an inability to take a definitive stand and defend it, instead relying on passive voice and non-sequiturs for fear of censure or challenge. Truly ironic that the previous post was entitled calling a spade a spade…
Aceface said
Jing:
It’s always interesting to see you become defender of truth and justice and human rights when ONLY it comes to Japan’s past,Jing.I know you’re stance on Tibetan and Uyghrs.
I take you don’t give a damn about countless apologies by the Japanese government,nor the historical debate restlessly going on in the mediaand the academia(mostly attacking the government and the right wingers stance) ,and Japanese history text books teaching the negative past of the country against the foreign hype.So why bother?
ampontan said
Jing: Hisashiburi desu ne!
Ask and ye shall receive!
You make a very curious claim, however.
Where, specifically, do I use the passive voice to avoid taking a personal stand? NOTE: Reporting or describing the statements of others does not count.
tomojiro said
Hah, look at the members who signed this Ad. Shudo Higashinakano, Nobukatsu Fujioka, Hidaki Kase et all.
An almost full cast of historical revisionists. And lawmakes like Jin Matsubara and Toru Toida. Also revisionists.
And they are thinking that they are doing a favor to Japan. Hah.
Aceface said
I laughed hysterical when I found those names on the ad.These guys are giving us so many own goals…
Can’t belive that NewsWeek gave some pages to let Kase to talk about the confort woman issues
a while back.He ain’t no historian,nor journlist.Just his dad was ambassador to UN ages ago and speak English.
tomojiro said
Do you know that Jin Matsubara and his friends are actually trying to do some ads about the Nanjing massacre?
Oh man, he must be mad.
look at these videos.
What realy piss me off is that they are thinking that this is a patriotic act.
In fact they are just playing exactly what the chinese and korean ultra nationalists want.
“The angry never aplogising, history distorting, dangerous Japanese.”
本当にこいつらバカ。頭に来る。
Jing said
Truth, justice, and human rights? I believe I never mentioned those things. All I requested, and received, was someone to fully articulate their position. Back in the old days, I never thought I’d become more interested in the historiography than the facts themselves, but here I am. It was just that to the trained eye, or even a simple critical one, this earlier post was quite evidently directly the reading to a conclusion through a passive manner by selective “descriptions” or “reporting” while attempting to disguise it.
Anyways, what gets my goat on the sex slavery issue is not the sex slaves themselves but rather the rhetorical methods use to somehow “disprove” that they ever existed in the first place. It’s one thing to say that Japan has offered enough apologies in compensation for them, and claim so out of simple political interest and expediency. It’s another to prevaricate and obfuscate the issue entirely to avoid apologizing at all. For example, the aspersions that are cast one an individual or a carefully isolated number of testifiers naturally leads readers to question the veracity of the claims. However, what is left unsaid is that there are tens of thousands of others still alive today whose grievances are no less valid, but are diminished nonetheless by being ignored.
Anyways, this whole issue is a tempest in a teacup and those few who read it in the Washington Post who no doubt come to the conclusion that the authors are simply some revisionist ass clowns. Not exactly helpful to Japan’s political image in the U.S. The Japanophiles who continue to insist that Japan has done no wrong while simultaneously claiming that Japan has atoned (How these two technically contrasting positions are bridged I’ll leave for a psychologist) will continue to prevaricate and shill with all of the intellectual and moral rigor of melting blubber (see Occidentalism).
ampontan said
“It was just that to the trained eye, or even a simple critical one, this earlier post was quite evidently directly the reading to a conclusion through a passive manner by selective “descriptions” or “reporting” while attempting to disguise it.”
You have yet to make this case. You also stated that I used “the passive voice” and “non-sequiturs”, but you still haven’t made that case, either.
bender said
Well, the likes of Jing does prove my earlier comment that Japan is not being criticized for direct, forceful recruitment of prostitutes (like how some in Japan like to make the issue contained in this way), but the fact that the Japanese government set up comfort stations for its soldiers. Now that some “revisionists” have made the bad move, those with anti-Japanese slants must be over-joyed. And here goes another round of Japan-bashing…
SweetWater said
Bender:
“Japan is not being criticized for direct, forceful recruitment of prostitutes (like how some in Japan like to make the issue contained in this way), but the fact that the Japanese government set up comfort stations for its soldiers.”
Your interpretation of the current comfort women issue is wrong. I wonder how you get that. Resolution 121, sponsored by Rep. Mike Honda, is not that nice. It claims that the Government of Japan should formally acknowledge, apologize, and accept historical responsibility in a clear and unequivocal manner for its Imperial Armed Force’s coercion of young women into sexual slavery, known to the world as ‘‘comfort women’’, during its colonial and wartime occupation . . .
All of the Japanese politicians and journalists know and admit that the Japanese government set up comfort stations for its soldiers during the war. However, Rep. Honda and his supporters are clearly claiming direct, forceful recruitment of not “prostitutes” but “sex slaves.” This difference is not negligible, and it is the exact reason why those journalists and congressmen post the advertisement in the Washington Post. Did you really read the ad?
izanami said
Why do people here show negative views about the ad in Wapo? It’s not only a subjective statement, but clearly contains actual evidence which has been buried deep underneath biased Western history, and in the anti-Japanese education practiced in Korea and China.
Japan has “officially” kept its mouth shut, occasionally voicing apologies, while paying extensive reparations. Who has appreciated Japan’s apologies, or even acknowledged them??
Are most of you worried that this might increase anti-Japanese sentiment in those countries, or trigger Japan-bashing worldwide? First, it is hardly imaginable that Japan-bashing would erupt in the world, overshadowed as it is by the U.S’s continuing unethical behavior. And, why worry about Korea and China? They never relent in their anti-Japanese sentiments.
During the war, history was recorded as pressured by propaganda, which was breathed like air. Why can’t we revisit it with intelligence and dignity?
Ampontan, it’s been quite some time since I first visited here. I like your thorough analysis and Buddhist mindset. Keep up your wonderful work.
SweetWater said
Jing:
“The Japanophiles who continue to insist that Japan has done no wrong while simultaneously claiming that Japan has atoned (How these two technically contrasting positions are bridged I’ll leave for a psychologist) will continue to prevaricate and shill with all of the intellectual and moral rigor of melting blubber (see Occidentalism).”
You don’t have to be a psychologist to understand on what those Japanese lawmakers are atoned and what they disagree. Why don’t you take a look at the bold-typed paragraph below “Fact 5” in the Washington Post advertisement? You will see those people do not insist that Japan has done nothing wrong.
(There might be some Japanophiles who claim Japan has done nothing wrong as you wrote, but, in general, they are not the same group of people who claim they have atoned. There is no single identity called Japan. People are heterogeneous, and you will never ever get a unanimous atonement from any nation.)
bender said
Sweetwater,
Sure, I read the ad.
I think you don’t get what I’m trying to say. Did Mr. Abe’s statement about the comfort women help in any way? No, it caused futher allegations that and criticism that Japan is onto hitsorical white-washing.
Sure, Mike Honda’s resolution seems harsh, and he’s deliberately using the word “sex slave” to demonize past Japanese actions. But normal people don’t really get into the details. I’m not talking about the merits of the allegations made by Koreans or Mike Honda, I’m talking about the international image of Japan. If you can read Japanese, check out what Mr. Okazaki said in the Sankei’s “Seiron”- I think he’s got it right on the issue. Its not whether it’s right or wrong, it’s about how Japan wants to depict herself, and how she deals with anti-Japanism. Here’s his opinion:
http://www.sankei.co.jp/ronsetsu/seiron/070514/srn07051400
BTW, I am troubled by the fact that there seems to be anti-Japanese feelings in Asian Americans, as the likes of Mike Honda and his supporters suggest. America is supposed to be free of old-world grudges, and it’s too bad they have to resort to this kind of stuff.
Izanami said
Jin,
“Anyways, what gets my goat on the sex slavery issue is not the sex slaves themselves but rather the rhetorical methods use to somehow “disprove” that they ever existed in the first place.”
-> So you certainly understand the “rhetorical” effect of the word “slave” in the American phyche.
“Japan has done no wrong”
-> Why do you see everything in black and white? Do you see grey in the scale between black and white?
Aceface,
“He ain’t no historian,nor journlist.Just his dad was ambassador to UN ages ago and speak English.”
-> Do you judge someone’s opinion by his/her occupation? Such a stereotypical view.
tomojiro
“An almost full cast of historical revisionists.”
-> Often rather than sometimes, what the old man said was not right.
ampontan said
Bender: That link to Okazaki’s not working…
Keroro said
Bender
>Sure, I read the ad.
Did you notice the name “Hisahiko Okazaki” on the ad ?
SweetWater said
Bender,
My objective is to find out (seek) the truth as precise as possible. So, regarding the comfort women controversy, setting the record straight is one of the best actions for the Japanese public if they believe there are some misunderstandings. I think posting an advertisement in the Washington Post is a good idea, although the best action was posting a detailed counter-argument in the Op-Ed section of the major newspapers, which was probably rejected.
Whether Japan would look nice or not is a secondary issue. To establish a good relationship between countries in the long run, I think, seeking the truth and presenting the facts are the most important. The truth makes the society stable, and the false accusations are not sustainable and only make people resentful.
The U.S. and Korea might be able to force the Japanese government to apologize for the systematic enslavement of girls during the war, which I believe is a groundless accusation. It would only make the anti-U.S. and anti-Korean sentiments in Japan boil up. Mike Honda and his Korean supporters have made a big mistake.
(Regarding your question, no, I don’t think Mr. Abe’s answer at the lower house budget committee meeting helped. However, I don’t think Mr. Abe should have lied either. It was a nasty tactics by the Democratic party and the Communist party to bring the comfort women issue to the budget committee.)
Edith Cavell said
In international law, the term used for the situation the comfort women found themselves in is “sex slave.” Thus, Mr Honda did not use that phrase lightly.
Mr Hata’s article is missing a number of critical facts not the least being that at issue is not coercion, which he does not understand, but that the Imperial government of Japan established, maintained, and sanctioned an organized system of brothels for its military. There quite a number of documents to prove this. In addition, the legal definition of coercion rests the principle of free will: did the person involved have the ability to resist the situation they found themselves in. In the case of the comfort women, none had that ability.
It is also interesting that Mr. Hata ignores the testimony of Mindy Kotler from Asia Policy Point at the Comfort Women hearing. Her testimony is a point by point factual and legal analysis of the so-called apologies by Japan. She describes how an official statement is made in Japan and outlines the history behind the Kono Statement, the Murayama Statement, and the Asian Women’s Fund. She also outlines the benefits of Japan offering an official and unequivocal statement on Comfort Women.
The resolution, far from being anti-Japanese, is quite pro-Japanese. It simply suggests (a resolution is not a demand) that Japan start to align itself with the 21st Century and other great powers.
bender said
In international law, the term used for the situation the comfort women found themselves in is “sex slave.” Thus, Mr Honda did not use that phrase lightly.
Wow! Did care to you look up Westlaw or Lexisnexis before you said that?
ampontan said
EC: We’re still waiting for your citation of material about Japanese lawsuits in the 30s filed by Japanese comfort women.
[[In international law, the term used for the situation the comfort women found themselves in is “sex slave.”]]
You might also cite this specific international law.
[[Mr Hata’s article is missing a number of critical facts not the least being that at issue is not coercion]]
Of course the issue is coercion. Since prostitution was legal at the time in Japan countries, and if women in fact were not coerced by the Japanese government, this issue does not exist.
[[the Imperial government of Japan established, maintained, and sanctioned an organized system of brothels for its military.]]
Which wasn’t against Japanese law.
[[There quite a number of documents to prove this.]]
Who is denying it?
[[In addition, the legal definition of coercion rests the principle of free will: did the person involved have the ability to resist the situation they found themselves in. In the case of the comfort women, none had that ability.]]
Perhaps it’s time for you to actually read the House subcommittee testimony. One of those women joined voluntarily. She snuck out of the house in the middle of the night to do so.
[[It is also interesting that Mr. Hata ignores the testimony of Mindy Kotler from Asia Policy Point at the Comfort Women hearing. Her testimony is a point by point factual and legal analysis of the so-called apologies by Japan. She describes how an official statement is made in Japan and outlines the history behind the Kono Statement, the Murayama Statement, and the Asian Women’s Fund.]]
All of which Mr. Hata knew about before Mindy Kotler.
[[She also outlines the benefits of Japan offering an official and unequivocal statement on Comfort Women.]]
The benefits as Mindy Kotler sees them. By the way, what is unofficial about the Kono Statement? What is equivocal about both?
[[It simply suggests (a resolution is not a demand) that Japan start to align itself with the 21st Century and other great powers.]]
Could you name some of these “great powers”, and provide a definition of what makes them great?
If you were so interested in having the UN gets its own act together today, in the 21st century, about its child prostitution rings, which seem to follow its “peacekeepers” around the world, and not focus solely on people dragging people who died in the 20th century into the 21st, it might help your case.
Ken said
[[In international law, the term used for the situation the comfort women found themselves in is “sex slave.”]]
You might also cite this specific international law.
She’s talking about nomenclature convention in international law, not specific laws. The comeback comes across as defensive.
ponta said
Edith
I think you have also made a good point.
And I think Hata has made a good point too.
bender said
She’s talking about nomenclature convention in international law, not specific laws. The comeback comes across as defensive
Not sure what this is supposed to mean. Elaborating the word “sex slave” to be some legal term/jargon seems quite like a cheap trick to me.
Bender said
Speaking of international law, the South Korean govenment unequivocally surrenderd its citizen’s individual right to reparations under the treaty with Japan.
It’s quite strange why this is never used in arguments against Japan or even for Japan.
One may argue that the comfort women were not included in the treaty, but unless the above term of the treaty can be interpreted as such (I’d bet both governments intended to inlcude all damages known at the time and any future damages that may be uncovered in the future, unless it wouldn’t make much sense as a treaty, would it?), don’t be so sure about it.
The fund was not to evade responsibility, but to compensate as much as possible under the treaty. The same kind of reparations was done by the Germans, who had bilateral treaties that settled the issue of reparations but paid to the individuals anyways by way of setting up funds. When the Germans do it, they’re praised for it, but when the Japanese do the same, it’s shameful. That’s how international politics move now.
ampontan said
Bender: Good points, but it’s unlikely Edith “Hit and Run” Clavell will read them. She shows up once a month to drop a letter bomb, makes unsubstantiated claims, and then moves on to something else.
Aceface said
Edith said:
“It is also interesting that Mr. Hata ignores the testimony of Mindy Kotler from Asia Policy Point at the Comfort Women hearing. Her testimony is a point by point factual and legal analysis of the so-called apologies by Japan. ”
Anybody want to know what Mindy Kotler had said and think about many things.
I suggest you all to go to National Bureau of Asian Research’s U.S-Japan relation online discussion threads.Kotler seems to me nobody but a firestarter with Washington speak.
Isnaciz said
Could someone please post an URL or such to any information entailing the war reparations?
Thanks.
ponta said
日本の戦争賠償と戦後補償 (Wikipedia)
Treaty of San Francisco (Wikipedia)
List of war apology statements issued by Japan (Wikipedia)
http://www.us.emb-japan.go.jp/english/html/cw1.htm
Isnaciz said
Thanks for links. However, “Treaty of San Francisco (Wikipedia)” did not provide any sources beyond the opening section. I would need to quote the actual documents/publications that provided the figures in the two tables. Preferably publications in English.
Thanks again.
ponta said
I don’t know what you would use the actual documents for.
But the followings are from MOFA
http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/shiryo/hakusyo/04_hakusho/ODA2004/html/zuhyo/zu010091.htm
So you might want to ask MOFA for the actual documents.
Isnaciz said
I am working on an essay discussing some causes of modern European wars, and in particular the WWI and WWII. The core of my essay is to compare the war reparations made by the losers since the Second French Empire. Thus I need to find out how much exactly the Japanese paid out, in comparison to Germany after WWII. In a minor chapter I also discuss the gains the Japanese Empire earned after WWI as a victor.
I just started my study on the Asia-Pacific nations. I’ll definitely try the government sources from Japan. Hopefully, the MOFA will respond.