AMPONTAN

Japan from the inside out

Down on the farm

Posted by ampontan on Monday, January 25, 2010

THE GLOBAL INFOTAINMENT MEDIA is intensely curious about trends in Japan, both to satisfy its voracious appetite for content and to maintain its preferred narrative of Japan as East Asia’s Goofball Kingdom. But here’s one trend they seem to have overlooked. Prof. Ito Motoshige of Tokyo University and the director of the National Institute for Research Advancement recently interviewed Itochu Corp. Chairman Niwa Uichiro for publication. This is how Prof. Ito set up the interview:

“Interest in agriculture is intense now. Publications ranging from business and economics journals to fashion magazines are covering the subject, and the slang term no-gyaru has even arisen to denote the young women engaged in farming.”

No-gyaru is a pun based on nogyo, the Japanese word for agriculture. Who knew that it was hip to be a hayseed in Japan nowadays? Certainly not the readers of the English-language media.

No-gyaru

Itochu is a large trading company with its fingers in a bakery full of pies, including the refining and sale of Chinese rice, so Mr. Niwa has at his fingertips a cornucopia of fascinating statistics about farming in Japan.

He asserted in the interview that Japanese agriculture could be internationally competitive, and the way to achieve that goal would be to maximize the use of land as an asset to produce value and to inculcate a sense of entrepreneurship among the farmers. Here are some highlights from that interview.

By the numbers

12% of Japanese territory is farmland
16% of Japanese territory was farmland 45 years ago
8.3% of Japanese farmland is not cultivated.
The latter figure represents an increase of three times in 20 years, and is equal to the land area of Saitama Prefecture.

2.99 million people: The farming population in 2008, a drop of 80% in 49 years
60%: The percentage of the farming populaton 65 or older

Demonstrating the fundamental problem with bureaucracies the world over:

290,000 people: The number of JA group employees 45 years ago (The central committee of agricultural cooperatives)
300,000 people: The number of JA group employees today

410,000 households: Employed in agriculture only, 16% of the total involved in agricultural production either full time or part time

56%: The ratio of Japanese cropland accounted for by rice paddies
4.2 tons of rice per unit of production area: The global average
6.7 tons of rice per unit of production area: The Japanese average

The Itochu president argued that Japanese rice is not as expensive to produce as some might think. Production costs per kilogram range from JPY 344 for 0.5 hectare plots or less, to JPY 160 for 10-15 hectare plots. He says that Itochu’s costs for refining and selling Chinese rice are JPY 105 per kilogram, and don’t include export costs.

Japanese rice would be price competitive, he maintains, even if all agricultural tariffs around the world were immediately removed. The key is to promote agribusiness on a large scale rather than through small farms.

This would be financially beneficial for agricultural workers, too. Converted to hourly wages, the producers on larger farms make JPY 3,100, or more than salaried employees. In contrast, those on the smallest farms make JPY 300 per hour, less than convenience store workers.

Mr. Niwa suggests that rice production should be concentrated in areas with broad plains, such as Hokkaido and the Tohoku region, while areas in the more mountainous western Japan, where it would be more difficult to operate larger farms, should switch to other fruits and vegetables. He says the latter farms would produce crops competitive with imports. For example, he reports that the more expensive Japanese cherries still sold well against imported American cherries due to their superior taste and freshness.

He proposed the delivery of food directly from the production site to the consumption site as an avenue that should be explored further. (I can vouch for this myself; we get apples shipped directly to our house from different production areas in Japan once a month from October to March. I’d recommend it to anybody.)

The government gets in the way

Mr. Niwa laments, however, that laws on land use and agriculture haven’t changed in 50 years. The government’s policy over the past half century has been to encourage acreage reductions to prop up rice prices. He holds that this has been a complete failure from a market perspective, and he used an analogy to demonstrate the bankruptcy of the approach.

It is as if, he suggested, a company responded to poor sales figures by slashing production and raising prices.

He is not the first to claim that the Ministry of Agriculture has been a complete a waste of time and resources. He also mentioned the zokugiin of the Diet, the MPs allied with different ministries and who promote their interests in the legislature. The zokugiin, he says, work to maintain those policies to receive the electoral support of rice farmers in particular, who benefit financially from the higher rice prices and the subsidies for acreage reductions.

The ruling Democratic Party of Japan is taking a step backwards from moves to encourage agribusiness and larger farms that were begun during the LDP administration of Abe Shinzo. The DPJ offered as part of their election platform a promise to provide subsidies to individual farm households.

That, says Mr. Niwa, is a mistake. The formulation of agricultural policies should be left to local governments, based on local conditions, and focus on policies for enterprises devoted exclusively to agriculture, whether operated by an individual or by a corporation.

He also suggests that local governments could form committees to lease farmland from individual farmers, aggregate it, and lease it in turn to those who want to work the land, including companies involved in agribusiness.

This is already happening today, and not all those companies are purely agricultural concerns. For example, Fukuoka City-based Kyudenko, primarily engaged in providing electric power facility engineering services, announced last week it had formed an agreement with the city of Amagusa, Kumamoto Prefecture, to grow olives. The agreement starts in FY 2010 and will run for three years. The company will plant 6,700 olive trees on unused cropland in the city, and will study cultivation techniques and the potential for profitability over that three-year period. If they like what they see, they will continue to grow olives. Kyudenko says it is open to using either public land or privately owned land.

In short, applying market principles would improve Japanese food production, make it a competitive enterprise, and solve the problems of unused land, the aging of the farming population, and the lack of successors. Key for the success of that endeavor would be to devolve authority to the local level and remove the influence of the bureaucracy and national legislator-lobbyists.

Where have we heard that one before?

Exploration and discovery

How did the media miss the chance to find out about the no-gyaru phenomenon and this discussion of domestic agricultural reform? They didn’t turn the page.

This interview appeared in last September’s edition of the monthly Voice. It was the same issue that published an article by Prime Minister Hatoyama Yukio explaining his political philosophy. It later was translated into English for the New York Times and caused a minor stir for its eccentric positions and apparent tilt away from the United States in foreign policy matters.

Mr. Hatoyama’s article ended on page 141, while this one began on page 142. The quote about no-gyaru was in the first paragraph.

Why should the impractical thought processes of a man destined to have the political lifespan of a firefly be of greater interest than a disussion of how a nation feeds itself?

3 Responses to “Down on the farm”

  1. mac said

    I don’t understand the figures. If 12% of Japanese territory is farmland whereas 16% of Japanese territory was farmland 45 years ago, and 8.3% of Japanese farmland is not cultivated, does that mean ‘only 4 to 8% of land is cultivated’, or ‘8% of a cultivatable 12 – 16%’ is not cultivated?

    Actually, I would have thought much more land was now not being cultivated. Where we are vast mountainside of beautiful dry stone terraces have been reclaimed by nature over the last 40 to 20 years and those farmers who remain have been pushed from self-sufficient local grains (not just rice) to growing citrus and berries on them.

    The one figure I do understand is that 290,000 people were employed 45 years ago and yet, with 25% less farm land and all sorts of wonderful machinery now available, 300,000 people are employed today. JA is the mafia enforcers wing for MAFF.

    With the drift off the land of rural population and the dying off of farmers, Japan faces a genuine crisis over the next 10 to 20 years and yet it seems to be sailing on blindly confident that it can just lease vast swathes of land in China, and import what it needs to feed its metroplises. Fine in the short term as long as there is no oil crisis. Disastrous for when there is at which point there are no farmers left.

    Food security through self-sufficiency should be the driving factor not market competition. Whatever happened, in this Post-digital age, to the promise of remote, distributed workforces? Could not more of the paid work be sent back to rural areas to support their economies through half-and-half lifestyles? Half on the land and half making money.

    In generally, I find the flavor and quality of fruit and veg in Japan is fantastic … but I am left wondering where all the small, ugly or misshapen fruit and veg goes. More concern, and shame, seems to be invested into the care, perfection and gift wrapped presentation of one’s vegetables than, say, one’s best looking daughter’s teeth. What does JA do with them all (the odd looking fruit and veg, not farmers’ daughters)?

    I’d be happier with a cheaper twisted dirty carrots … (and most of the good looking daughters would be benefited by a trip to an orthodontist).

  2. ampontan said

    8% of the land designated as farmland today is not cultivated.

  3. Ezochi said

    …but I am left wondering where all the small, ugly or misshapen fruit and veg goes…

    More and more it is being sold to grateful consumers looking for value and safety from dubious imported produce, especially in the growing number of farmer’s markets and co-op stores selling organic. Shopping outside of the department stores and big chain supermarkets yields trends and observations that are seldom noticed or reported on by the mainstream foreign press.
    ———-
    I’ve been trying to talk my wife into buying a good juicer, which can be expensive. That would also be an excellent way to use the unattractive but highly edible produce.

    – A.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: