AMPONTAN

Japan from the inside out

Shimojo Masao (4): An Jung-geun’s On Peace in East Asia

Posted by ampontan on Friday, November 6, 2009

An Jung-geun’s On Peace in East Asia

Ito Hirobumi, Japan’s first prime minister, was assassinated at a Harbin train station in Manchuria by the Korean An Jung-geun in October 1909. There is a tendency in South Korea to excessively praise An’s essay, On Peace in East Asia, for its resemblance to the concept of an East Asian entity promoted by Prime Minister Hatoyama Yukio.

From a historical perspective, On Peace in East Asia, which An finished in 1910, is similar to Prime Minister Hatoyama’s idea in that it is based on a trite concept that ignores reality. The concept of an East Asian entity had already been elucidated in 1880 by Chinese diplomat Huang Zun-xiang in his Joseon Strategy. In the year before the 1894 war between Japan and China, Tarui Tokichi also wrote the Treatise on Unifying (Japan and Korea into the State of) The Great East. The problem, however, was whether the historical conditions were in order in Korea at that time to create such an entity.

Huang Zun-xiang in his Joseon Strategy viewed an alliance of Qing Dynasty China, Korea, and Japan as indispensable for the survival of Korea, located to the south of Russia. But the Joseon ruling class fiercely opposed his strategy, and his concept of an East Asian entity was not realized. Indeed, in Korea, Queen Min (Empress Myeongseong) and her clan wielded arbitrary political power over the peninsula. She sold public positions in the bureaucracy to the highest bidder, which created turmoil in the realm. That turmoil in turn led eventually to the Japanese war with China.

After the Japan-China War, the Liaodong Peninsula in China was ceded to the Japanese. Negotiations with Russia, Germany, and France after the territory came under Japanese control resulted in a stronger Russian influence on the Korean Peninsula. Russia’s “Southern Policy”, about which Huang Zun-xiang expressed concern in his Joseon Strategy, had become a reality.

In 1904, Japan began hostilities with Russia, which had extended its influence into Mongolia. The Korean Lee Ki had a vision of dividing Mongolia into three spheres of influence if it came under Japanese control. According to his vision, giving the eastern part of Mongolia to Japan, the southern part to Korea, and the western part to Qing Dynasty China would prevent an invasion by Russia.

At that time, both China and Korea were ruled by monarchies from the Middle Ages. Only Japan had a constitutional government. Ignoring the differences in social structure and the phases of historical development, and assassinating Ito in the name of On Peace in East Asia, was an act that beggars belief.

– Shimojo Masao

*****

Afterwords: This short essay is an excellent example of a point I sometimes try to make here: relations between Japan, China, and Korea have been so complex for such a long period of time that contemporary conditions do not admit of superficial analysis by outside observers, particularly those unfamiliar with the historical background. Some additional information of interest: An was a converted Catholic, an admirer of the Meiji Tenno (emperor), and was anxious to create an East Asian entity as a defense against the “White Plague”. Contemporary South Korea’s view of Queen Min tends to the hagiographic; her life was used as the basis for a popular musical, in which she was depicted as a tragic heroine and the mother of her country. Also, Russia, France, and Germany intervened after the Japan-China War to persuade Japan to return the Liaodong Peninsula to China. The almost immediate occupation of the peninsula by Russia after its return was a casus belli for the war between Japan and Russia.

4 Responses to “Shimojo Masao (4): An Jung-geun’s On Peace in East Asia

  1. Jason said

    Actually, I think most contemporary Koreans are split into two factions when they discuss whether An’s actions were justified or not and the deeper discussions surrounding the situations that led up to that incident. Although he has generally been revered as a hero, he’s more of just a symbol (at least from what I can perceive). You also brought up Queen Min in the Afterward comment, and again, people in Korea will be split on her character as well (there were internal politics in Chosun that complicate her story). But again, Queen Min can also be viewed as a symbol by Koreans. Her assasination is used more as a springboard for the outrage towards the colonists during that period. I’d be curious to see how some Japanese view the assasination of Queen Min.

  2. Aceface said

    “I’d be curious to see how some Japanese view the assasination of Queen Min.”

    It was a political assassination to wipe out her influence in the court by the Japanese extremist.There has been some different opinion how much the government was involved in assassination,though.

  3. bender said

    Compare:

    Is America a racist state?

    With guys like Limbaugh being popular and defended by major newspapers like the WSJ, myriad of websites dedicated to white supremacy, neo-nazi organizations existing in every state except maybe for Alaska & Hawaii (see map below)…it must very uncomfortable to be a colored person in America, or is it?

    http://www.splcenter.org/intel/map/hate.jsp

  4. bender said

    Or, is it just a reflection that Americans enjoy freedom of speech…a rare privilege not shared across the globe.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: