Japan’s political kaleidoscope (5): One degree of separation
Posted by ampontan on Wednesday, June 16, 2010
HUNGARIAN AUTHOR Frigyes Karinthy is credited with developing the concept of “six degrees of separation”, which holds that everyone on earth is at most only six links in a human web away from everyone else.
But with Japanese politics you can stretch the definition just a bit and the separation between everyone shrinks to only one degree!
*****
When the Hatoyama administration was burning up on reentry into the atmosphere last month, Democratic Party of Japan elder statesman Watanabe Kozo (who as a former Liberal Democratic Party member and former friend of Ozawa Ichiro in both parties is a key player in the degree of separation game) suggested that the DPJ might form a coalition government with the hard-line reformers of Your Party. A few columnists in the weekly magazines picked up the idea and gummed it over.
Your Party Secretary-General Eda Kenji was having none of it:
I firmly declare that we will not join with the DPJ after the upper house election….If we were to form a coalition with the DPJ, it would be suicide for the party. It’s not going to happen.
It’s a wise man who never says never about anything in Japanese politics, but Mr. Watanabe and the journalists really are out of touch. Your Party does not just stand for bureaucratic reform, small government, devolution of power, and lower taxes, they stomp their feet on that platform like lumberjacks at a hoedown. They are as much an agenda party in their own way as the Communists are in theirs. It should go without saying that it would be political hara-kiri for them to sell out to the DPJ by joining a coalition, but some people are still looking through the eyeglasses of the last century.
Someone else who should have known better is the Internet pundit who suggested that we’d find out what Your Party is really like after they join a larger party. Not only are they unlikely to join either the DPJ or the LDP as presently constituted, it is more likely that people will wind up joining them, particularly if they do well in the upper house election. Every day the RSS feeds coughs up another article about a new Your Party candidate announcing his candidacy in either the national or a local election.
*****
Speaking of Watanabe Kozo, he had this to say in a TV interview on the 11th about Ren Ho, the new Minister for Government Reform:
Having a minister like that in the television age is good for our popularity with the people. She’s a made-for-TV minister.
Out of the mouths of babes and the elderly. Ren Ho is now ending her first term in the upper house after a career as a model and TV announcer.
When Mr. Watanabe tried to recover, he shoved his foot in deeper:
She’s a flower, the Cabinet’s flower, both in name and in fact.
*****
Speaking of Ren Ho, her mother recalled this in a recent interview:
Just before he died, her father told her, ‘Whatever you do, don’t go into politics,’ and now she’s a Cabinet minister.
Ren Ho’s father was Taiwanese and her mother is Japanese. She became a naturalized citizen in 1985.
The leaders of her party, including Messrs. Kan, Hatoyama, Ozawa, and particularly Foreign Minister Okada Katsuya, are supporters of legislation allowing people with permanent resident status the right to vote in local elections (though the Japanese expression refers to political participation, which also implies candidacy).
They wanted to include this pledge in the party’s political platform for last summer’s lower house election campaign, but someone launched a petition drive to prevent that. The petition was circulated among the party’s Diet members and got roughly 50 signatures. Though her office denies it, she is thought to have been the person most involved in collecting those signatures. She is also on record as saying:
If you want the right to vote, you should become a citizen.
*****
Here’s what else Ren Ho said on the record, this time at a news conference on the 15th about the recovery of the Hayabusa capsule in Australia after seven years and four billion miles in deep space. It was the first spacecraft to land on an asteroid and return to Earth. Scientists are anxious to see if it brought back a sample from the asteroid Itokawa, on which it landed twice in 2005.
Said the minister:
All Japanese should be proud of this magnificent achievement. We made a major statement to the world.
One of the reporters present pointed out that the DPJ policy review conducted last November—the platform that launched her into the Cabinet—cut the budget for space exploration. One of the items whose budget was slashed–from JPY 1.7 billion to JPY 30 million–was the program to create a successor for the Hayabusa.
First she bought some time:
I was not directly responsible for space exploration (in the policy review). I’m in the process of confirming what happened.
And then she answered:
We shouldn’t defend all the results of the policy review, no matter what. Of course we should incorporate the different opinions and judgments of the people when compiling the next budget.
This is the person the Japan Times called a “firebrand reformer”.
She may be a relative newcomer to politics, but she’s already grown a second face.
*****
Speaking of two-faced politicians, Tanaka Shusei reminded people in the current issue of the weekly Shukan Gendai that when Prime Minister Hashimoto Ryutaro concluded the agreement with the Americans in 1996 to move the Futenma marine base to another location in Okinawa, current Prime Minister Kan Naoto was a member of the New Party Sakigake, which was part of the coalition government. Mr. Kan was in the Cabinet as the Health Minister, and former Prime Minister Hatoyama Yukio was then the acting secretary general of the party.
Neither man objected to the agreement at the time.
*****
Speaking of Tanaka Shusei and the lack of a dime’s worth of difference between the two major parties, Mr. Tanaka had this to say about the DPJ’s comeback in the polls in the Weekly Diamond online:
This closely resembles the events of last year, in which disillusionment with the LDP government resulted in a DPJ government. We cannot ignore that the disillusionment with and unpopularity of the Hatoyama Yukio government (the Ozawa – Hatoyama structure) is linked to the public’s expectations for the new Cabinet. At any rate, it is likely that most people wanted to end the Hatoyama administration in the same way they wanted to end the LDP administration.
*****
Speaking of Ozawa Ichiro, he was in the Kumano area of Wakayama on the 12th. It was his first trip outside of Tokyo since Hatoyama Yukio maneuvered him out of the post of DPJ secretary general. Mr. Ozawa has a habit of saying things that raise people’s eyebrows. He did it again:
People with an illness have come to this area since ancient times for rebirth or resuscitation. This land has long held a belief in revival.
Just like the Terminator, eh? “I’ll be back!”
*****
Speaking of reminding people of the old LDP, the new Cabinet’s national strategy minister, Arai Satoshi (of the Kan faction) was found to have purchased some curious items that he charged to office expenses. And speaking of Mr. Arai’s office, it was found to have been located smack dab in the residence of what the media called “an acquaintance”. The DPJ released receipts for the years 2007 to 2009, and a total of JPY 42.44 million (about $US 462,000) of his expenses turned out to be of dubious value for political activity.
Count on the Akahata, the house organ of Japan’s Communist Party, to have the most detailed list. Here’s what they said he charged:
Under the category of equipment and consumables:
JPY 4,485 for five volumes of Yazawa Ai’s Paradise Kiss comics (37 comic magazines were charged in all)
JPY 2,210 for a hamburger set at the McDonald’s at Nagata-cho
Also:
JPY 2,500 for a CD of background music for pachinko parlors
JPY 26,500 for books on improving pachinko technique
JPY 22,670 for 18 articles of clothing, including underwear, briefs, and camisoles
JPY 7,350 for toys purchased at a department stores
Under office expenses:
JPY 2,300 for a massage at a Sapporo massage parlor
JPY 150,000 for a man’s suit
JPY 2,547 for onions, milk, and cooking oil bought at a supermarket
Mr. Arai said the comic book receipt got mixed in with the real expenses, but he had no explanation for the others.
The response of the DPJ was also reminiscent of the LDP. Acting Secretary General Hosono Goshi said on TBS:
It’s not against the law to buy comics, but it is inappropriate. I hope he adjusts his accounts quickly.
Looking after his own, Prime Minister Kan said he doesn’t think Mr. Arai should resign, but everyone knows what he would have said had the man been in a different party. They know because they remember what he usually said about politicians in other parties when the DPJ was in the opposition.
*****
Speaking of Mr. Kan, and “that was then, this is now”-type answers, the prime minister was asked in the Diet about his reasons for submitting an amendment to the 1999 bill that would have removed the clause making Kimi ga Yo the official national anthem. At the time, then-DPJ party head Hatoyama Yukio argued in favor of his colleague’s measure because of what he termed the song’s unpleasant wartime associations.
Eleven years later, however, Mr. Kan told a different story. He explained there was a difference in opinion in the DPJ at the time, and added:
Some (in the party) thought a livelier national anthem would be better.
*****
Speaking of Mr. Kan making stuff up, he did it again on the 14th in the Diet. Mr. Kan has often cited political scientist Nagai Yonosuke as a political and personal influence. Prof. Nagai taught at the Tokyo Institute of Technology when Mr. Kan was a student there, and the two stayed in contact after he graduated. The prime minister has said:
We had a close relationship for a long time.
It turns out that another admirer of Prof. Nagai was Watanabe Yoshimi, now the head of Your Party. Mr. Watanabe said that when he was a student at Waseda, he snuck over to the other campus to sit in on his classes. He said he was struck with the depth of his thought and the beauty of his prose.
Mr. Watanabe asked the prime minister:
Prof. Nagai said that Article 9 of the Constitution (the Peace Clause) should be amended. What do you think?
Replied Mr. Kan, on the most-frequently debated subject in Japanese politics over the past 65 years:
The topic of Article 9 itself never came up in discussion between us.
See, it’s not necessary to think fast to be a politician. You just have to say something fast.
*****
Speaking of Mr. Kan, let’s take a closer look at Kan the Man. We’ve already quoted Tanaka Shusei once today, so let’s take a second dip from the weekly Shukan Gendai:
I’ve seen both Miyazawa Kiichi and Hosokawa Morihiro serve as prime minister at close range. From that experience, I can say that a person’s abilities and character are completely exposed once they become prime minister. Deception and disguise are absolutely impossible. That is the decisive difference between being a party leader and being a prime minister. Mr. Hatoyama became prime minister without understanding that. Eventually, after eight months, every aspect of his personality was laid bare before the people.
Since the Kan breech has long been exposed in Japan, let’s transfer some of it to English.
*****
It’s nearly impossible to read a feature article about Mr. Kan that doesn’t include a mention of his hair-trigger temper. He’s been trying to keep a lid on it for past month or two, after it became apparent that the Hatoyama administration was evaporating and he was the likely choice to succeed him.
But most Japanese journalists expect it to erupt eventually, and it won’t be attractive when it does.
For example, one report from earlier this year had him throwing an ashtray at a bureaucrat who told him it was not possible to do what Mr. Kan asked him to do.
The steam might already be rising. Mr. Kan revealed at a news conference that he was unlikely to ask for an extension of the Diet session just to pass the Japan Post legislation. Reporters told him that the opposition had charged him with “running away from” the issue.
Cue the unpleasant face and the sharp voice: “What criticism was this? Why are they criticizing?” He asked four times in all.
The Asahi ran an editorial titled Realism without the Specifics about his first speech as prime minister in the Diet. Snapped the prime minister:
Did they listen to all of it? I wanted to say things that were even more serious.
*****
Mr. Kan is a fan of go. One of the reporters assigned to the Kantei said the prime minister had became hooked on the online Pandanet go game, and was frequently seen playing it on the PC in his Deputy Prime Minister’s office. The reporter added: “But when he went to the Diet he just sat there with his eyes closed.”
*****
The Japanese tend to be indulgent of men who are serious drinkers, and most Japanese men who consume prodigious amounts of alcohol are blasé about it. During his university days, Mr. Kan’s favorite pastime was drinking and arguing politics, and he seems to have turned his avocation into his life’s work. One report this week described him with the expression, sakekuse ga warui, or a problem drinker.
Maybe there’s a reason he nods off so frequently in the Diet.
In the current edition of the weekly Shukan Bunshun, freelance journalist and open DPJ sympathizer Uesugi Takashi describes the background of the founding of the modern DPJ. He was an aide to Hatoyama Kunio at the time (who was also present at the creation). Mr. Uesugi reports that Mr. Kan, Hatoyama Yukio, and their wives met secretly at the latter’s villa in Karuizawa. He thought there was nothing amiss about reporting that Mr. and Mrs. Kan knocked back more than a few jars during the meeting, as the Irish say.
Speaking of Mrs. Kan, by the way, she and her husband are first cousins. Her mother and his father were siblings. Those marriages aren’t encouraged in Japan, but they do happen.
The current edition of the weekly Shukan Shincho ran some informal photos taken at the couple’s home one morning in 1998, shortly after that meeting in Karuizawa. There were open beer cans (tall boys of Kirin Ichiban Shibori) on the kitchen counter and kitchen table, probably left there from the night before.
They also recounted several of his escapades, one of which occurred at his favorite drinking establishment, identified as S.
In 2006 he was a candidate in the race to replace Maehara Seiji as DPJ party president, to whom he had lost by two votes in the same election the previous year. Friends tried to talk him out of it, but he ran anyway and was trounced by Ozawa Ichiro. That night, he got ripped on white wine at S, shouted to no one in particular, “I’m the one who built this party! Why shouldn’t I run (for party head)?” and passed out on the floor. (I’m assuming tatami mats in an alcove, but then I’ve never been to S.) He woke up when another customer’s dog mounted him. He started petting the dog and exclaimed, “Wan-chan, thank you!” (Wan-chan is a generic term for addressing a dog. I don’t know how else to translate noru for what the dog did, which is the word the magazine used.)
*****
Mr. Kan also has a vision, and it isn’t one of pink elephants. According to the Shukan Shincho:
The reason I left the Socialist Democratic Federation was that in my 30s, I thought a small party was the best way to stay on as a Diet member, but in my 40s, I wanted to go to a larger party and take leadership positions within the party. From the latter part of my 40s to my 50s, I wanted to be the leader of a large organization. Then, in my 60s, I would be prime minister. That is my vision.
He did not use the word for dream or ambition. It was bijon, taken from English.
Mr. Kan also thinks highly of himself. In 1998 he met Lawrence Summers when the latter was in Japan and a deputy treasury secretary in the Clinton administration. After the meeting, he told an aide:
He’s not such a big deal.
The lightweight Mr. Summers later became the last treasury secretary in the Clinton administration, served as Harvard president for five years, and is now the director of the National Economic Council in the Obama administration.
When the economist Milton Friedman died, Summers wrote an Op-Ed in The New York Times called The Great Liberator. He said that “any honest Democrat will admit that we are now all Friedmanites.” He added that even more important than Friedman’s contribution to monetary policy was his work “in convincing people of the importance of allowing free markets to operate.”
It would surely be enlightening to hear the heavyweight Mr. Kan—a former finance minister himself for a few months—discuss anything to do with Milton Friedman’s theories, either pro or con.
*****
Speaking of Mr. Kan and economic policy, Takahashi Yoichi wrote a column in the Gendai Business on 14 June about Mr. Kan’s maiden Diet speech. It’s long and in Japanese, so here’s a summary.
Mr. Takahashi said the speech consisted of a rehash of his political experience and a summarization of the policies for each ministry, which consisted of several lines each. The journalist was startled to see that Prime Minister Kan had gone back to the old LDP custom of reading aloud from what the bureaucracy calls tanzaku, or strips of paper. Each ministry presents a sheet of paper with a few sentences for the prime minister to say, and they’re stapled together to use as a text. Recent prime ministers had abandoned the practice, but Mr. Kan brought that back. The bureaucrats, said Mr. Takahashi, must have been delighted to see him reading from their script again.
He also addressed Mr. Kan’s claim that his policies would be a “third way”, with the public works pork of the LDP being the first way and the extreme market fundamentalism of the ten-year period centered on the Koizumi administration (2001-2006) being the second way. The prime minister blasted the excessive deregulation of the second way.
Mr. Takahashi—a former Finance Ministry bureaucrat/turncoat—pointed out that in the 1998 OECD ranking of G7 nations by stringency of regulatory systems, with the top position being the least regulated, Japan was #5. Ten years later, in 2008, they were fourth, overtaking Germany.
The prime minister charged that the Koizumi restructuring had caused widespread unemployment. Mr. Takahashi noted that the total number of employed persons rose by one million during the five years of the Koizumi administration, and has fallen by 30,000 since the DPJ formed a government last September.
Further, Mr. Takahashi referred to DPJ claims that income gaps widened during the Koizumi era. The OECD uses the Gini Coefficient to monitor that gap. In their rankings of the G7 countries, Japan was 4th in the Gini Coefficient in 1998, and stayed there through the mid-2000s. In fact, with this used as a metric, the income gap actually shrank in Japan under Mr. Koizumi (and in Great Britian) while it expanded in some other G7 countries during that period.
Mr. Takahashi warns the DPJ will use these fables as the justification to fashion policies that will limit deregulation and redistribute income to reduce the so-called income gap. He used the Japanese expression, e ni kaita mochi, or a rice cake drawn into a picture, to describe the DPJ approach.
In English, we’d say “pie in the sky”.
****
Speaking of Mr. Kan, drinking, and supercalifragilisticexpialidocious economic policies, the Shukan Gendai quotes a Finance Ministry official describing an impromptu news conference with the reporters assigned to cover the prime minister at the Kan residence last week. Mr. Kan was sailing along righteously–whether from white wine or Kirin tall boys, he didn’t say.
The new prime minister claimed the people would swallow a rise in the consumption tax to 15% if the funds were diverted to long term care, social welfare, and pensions. He then said that when the economy improved, they could cut the rate back to 8%.
Speaking of rice cakes drawn into pictures…
The Finance Ministry official said he heard the story second hand, but liked what he heard. They could work with a prime minister like that.
*****
And speaking of people in the government whose economic ideas have about as much substance as an empty Kirin tall boy can, Ikeda Motohisa is one of the new deputy finance ministers. He was also one of roughly 130 DPJ MPs that proposed in April the passage of a law requiring the Bank of Japan to set an annual inflation rate of more than 2% as a target.
*****
I have a feeling this is not going to end very well either, whenever it ends.
And that means there won’t be any degrees of separation at all from this administration and its recent predecessors.
Mr. Hatoyama had all the political substance of a piece of wet flannel. That might not turn out to be so bad, in retrospect. Mr. Kan, on the other hand, could cause some real damage.










Joe Jones said
There’s a lot to argue with here, but I’ll stick to one factual error. Renho did not naturalize. Her mother is Japanese and her father is not, which means that she would be born Japanese under the current nationality law, but was not entitled to birthright nationality prior to the enactment of the amended nationality law of 1985. Once the law was changed, she retroactively became Japanese, and she promptly de-naturalized from Taiwan. As I said in a comment on another blog, “she was as Japanese as she could possibly be under the circumstances.”
——
Thanks for the note, JJ. My sentence reads, “she became a naturalized citizen”, and The Japanese source read 帰化.
You call it a factual error, I call it nitpicking. And slim pickings they were.
- A
M-Bone said
Not like Your Party is immune to contradictions, however.
Just off the top of my head, I can remember 浅尾慶一郎 last year proposing (in the media) “float a retried US aircraft carrier out in the ocean there and use that” as a solution to the Futenma deal. I mean, they only have what, a half dozen giin, and this one is clearly out to lunch on this issue anyway. That’s the kind of solution that progressives jokingly come up with. In private. When drunk.
Also, it is my understanding that American neo-liberals (and libertarians) have been arguing for some time now that more flexibility, less conservativism, and less regulation is needed in the Japanese labor market and this is a necessary condition for growth. I also recall this being a key issue during Koizumi’s tenure. Your Party, however, is putting forward a bunch of policy suggestions that don’t seem a whole lot different from those of the Communist Party including – equal pay for equal work for permanent and temporary employees, improved public housing and reduced medical insurance payments for the long term unemployed (in terms that pussyfoot around but seem an awful lot like a mandate for increasing welfare spending), increasing the minimum wage, cracking down on unpaid overtime (ie. direct intervention in corporate culture) with the aim of having companies hire more employees, and eliminating day labor. This is a big step back from some of the reforms implemented in the Koizumi days and, on the whole, doesn’t seem radically different from the slate of DPJ proposals. I really don’t see how they can expect to do this while reducing taxes and eliminating deficits.
They’re also promising to more than double the current 子ども手当 amount to 30,000 yen per child per month until age 15, free medical care until primary school, increase (and apparently heavily subsidize daycare). They also promise straight up to 社会的弱者に配慮した所得再分配を強化する.(その財源として、人定控除の見直しや高額所得者への課税強化(所得税、相続税等)を検討。) This kind of language should make libertarians gag, no? It also seems unrealistic to talk about doing things like this while reducing deficits and taxes.
They’re also apparently going to do all kinds of expensive stuff to education like introduce dramatically smaller class sizes in order to increase the role of direct experience in education. And once again a focus on egalitarianism that has to be paid for 親の貧富で教育格差が広がらない環境整備。高校、専門学校、大学等の高等教育への奨学金制度の拡充. There’s that kakusa word so loved by the left.
Some more – 日本は、「唯一の被爆国」という原点に立ち返って、また、「アジアの中の日本」という認識に立脚し、「核廃絶」「世界平和」に向けて、持てる力をフルに活用し、国際社会において主導的役割を果たしていくべきである。That could have been straight from the JCP webpage, but it comes from Your Party’s. I also don’t see how this is so different from “yuai” – 成長しつつある「30億人のアジア市場」を「国内市場」「内需」とする消費拡大を実現。車・電機・機械だけに頼る単純なモノづくり信仰から脱却。これまで内需型産業とされていた流通(コンビニ、専門店)、物流(宅配便)、教育(学習塾)、福祉(高齢者介護、老人ホーム)、農業、食品等の海外進出・輸出を強力に支援。同時に、医療(高度医療・高級健康診断)、大学、観光などでアジアからの顧客を誘致し、少子化のハンディキャップを克服
And ->
# 中国、韓国、アセアン、米国、豪州、インド等を含むアジア太平洋地域内で、経済、エネルギー、環境、安全保障各分野での協力を促進。
# アジアを一つの市場とみなし、国内市場と一体化して域内経済を活性化。「サムライボンド」(「円建て債」)の活用による域内インフラ、物流等の整備。
# アジアの通貨防衛、為替安定を図るため、アジア版通貨基金構想を推進。
This mantra of increasing economic integration and security cooperation doesn’t seem to differ a whole lot from the DPJ. They sure aren’t any more interested in pushing China on human rights, at least not according to the manifesto or anything easily available in the media.
On foreign affairs, they seem to accept that the Iraq War was dishonest/a failure, which parallels the mainstream progressive position – イラク戦争等の反省に基づき、自衛隊の海外派遣については、しっかりとした原理原則を定める法律を策定。It certainly doesn’t look like this is going to lead to the type of backup in the Middle East and elsewhere that the US has hoped for from Japanese conservatives.
In effect, there are many Your Party policy parallels with the center-left. Since Kan came in, they already seem to have lost about a quarter of their support (latest Sankei poll) and I can see why – they parallel DPJ on issues important to the Japanese public (lifestyle, employment, education improvement) and now that the hated Ozawa/Hatoyama manzai team is out, the wind is going out of the Your Party sails.
I’m not really feeling this “lumberjacks at a hoedown” thing – it seems like they want loads of regulation and hand over fist government spending in some of the same places that the left of the spectrum parties do. So do they want to have their cake and eat it too?
toadold said
That minimum wage thing is not working to well in my area of Texas. It is driving youth unemployment (teen agers to 21)even higher in conjunction with the already high unemployment rates. You had independent young people working two to three part time low end jobs and using food stamps to make it. Then they raised the minimum wage and now the low end jobs are getting hard to find when employers can get adults with experience for the required minimum wage. It seems that the “elite” everywhere just can not comprehend that everybody doesn’t have wealthy parents and employers can’t afford to risk their business paying high wages to inexperienced and untrained workers.
bender said
Mbone:
Like you noted, the Libertarian ideology is not widely accepted in Japan. I also doubt whether Japanese “neo-liberals” are what they claim to be, especially in light of shady deals surrounding the offsprings of the “reform” like the one we see with the Incubator Bank of Japan unravelling right now. Anyhow, IMHO, with the fall of Livedoor and Murakami Fund, the momentum was lost, and with the average salary of the Japanese actually decreasing regardless of the “economic boom”, a throwback was inevitable. It’s hard to sell the ideology of entrepreneurs to people who are mostly salaried workers and cannot afford “freedom”.
M-Bone said
I saw some interesting surveys (done in 2008) the other day. One suggests that the rate of “yes” answers to “should the government encourage competition in society” to be similar to that of the United States. Another suggests that the rate of “yes” answers to “should the government take strong measures to guarantee the lifestyles/livelihoods of the people” is similar to that of France or Italy. In effect, Japanese voters want the government to throw things open to competition for everyone, just not for ME. So in effect, the majority of Japanese seem to favor a big, involved government and Your Party is trying to capitalize on this.
In any case, I’m actually hopeful about the DPJ and sympathetic toward the Socialists and Communists (but see small government arguments as a necessary counterpoint).
—-
MB: Take a tip from the former Socialists and Communists. North Korea announced it will allow free markets (in food, anyway), and the Russians are eliminating the capital gains tax next year, to go along with their 13% flat tax.
- A.
M-Bone said
But couldn’t Russia use a bit more in the way of big government response to its sky high suicide rate (almost 3 times Japan’s high rate), murder rate that is something like 5 times that of the United States (speaking of chronic gangsterism, twice Mexico’s!), huge levels of human trafficking, and an economy that is only growing in bounds because of oil reserves that will run out in about 15 years leaving an undereducated and impoverished population living with levels of bloodshed, chaos, and a lack of sustainable prospects that look like civil war? I’m all for free markets, but unless those tax breaks could buy me a fortress and a team of crack bodyguards, I’d like a government to be committed to providing at least a modicum of internal security and the kind of minimum level of human dignity that can result in a foundation of human capital and commitment to collective projects (like economic momentum or at least having a society that isn’t awful) that results in growth and increasing prosperity.
———
MB:
The rule of law, property rights, and true democracy are not only compatible with free markets, they go together like peaches and cream. We await the day when Russia tries that. An enlightened tax system would make them all function even better, and that combination would likely allow for a natural solution of the suicide rate.
That’s about the only way the government could address that problem. There are no big government solutions to problems of that sort, and most attempts either fail or make the problem worse. Thomas Sowell’s Vision of the Anointed is filled with examples (and footnotes) of how big government attempts to fix social problems made them worse.
- A.
M-Bone said
A “suicide task force” wouldn’t do much, no. But increasing the standard of public education and providing security through well-paid and well-organized police forces, including substantial resources to combat corruption couldn’t hurt – especially with the murder rate. I’m not sure that you could argue that the establishment of universal literacy through government initiatives or the usurping of violence from local elites and placing it into the hands of centrally organized police and military infrastructure did anything but create the climate of security and success that led first to the industrial revolution and then to the massive economic growth of the 20th century in countries like Japan, the United States, and England. I think that Russia is an example of a country that went from having too much state and security to not enough (not counting its massive and ludicrous military spending focused on international prestige while the country itself goes to hell). Perhaps a country has to get up to a certain level of sustainable prosperity, security, and civic commitment before small government can even become a discussion.
————-
Not everyone agrees:
Nowadays, thanks to government schooling:
The National Center for Education Statistics divides literacy into prose, document, and quantitative literacy. 14% of the adult population is at the “below basic” level for prose literacy, 12% are at the “below basic” level for document literacy, and 22% are at the same level for quantitative literacy. 13% of the population in contrast, is proficient in these three areas—comparing viewpoints in two editorials; interpreting a table about blood pressure, age, and physical activity, and computing and comparing e the cost per ounce of food items.
The Daily Telegraph (14 June 2006): “one in six British adults lacks the literacy skills of an 11-year-old”. The UK government’s Department for Education: in 2006 47% of children left school at 16 without having achieved a basic level in functional mathematics. 42% do not have a basic level of functional English.
The Guardian (10 July 2007): Every year 100,000 pupils leave school functionally illiterate in the UK.
There are also stats that show 20% of Americans aged 14 and older were illiterate in 1870; I suspect most of those lived in rural areas and never went to school at all.
Unlike 14-year-olds today.
- A.
M-Bone said
I think that you have to consider the standards that are used to define literacy in different historical periods. Functionally illiterate leaving UK schools in 2007 is, according to research that I have seen, superior to the literacy discussed by scholars dealing with the 19th century when it was often defined as the ability to read out (but not necessarily comprehend) a Bible passage. In official discourse in the United States in the 19th century, literacy was a requirement for voting with literacy defined as “the ability to sign one’s complete name”. My preferred source on this is Graff’s “Literacy and Historical Development: A Reader”, which includes a variety of points of view. I think that we can both agree that a pre-modern standard of education (largely church provided and many of those churches were taking massive tithes – what education was provided to the masses in the premodern period was still supported by a form of extra-state “taxation” by people who felt that they had god’s kingdom to serve) isn’t the type of thing that could make, say, rural Russians competitive in a contemporary globalized economy.
Japan had a very high literacy rate in the 19th century by any measure (supported by temple schools paid into by the 40% taxes peasants were paying to what were effectively self-interested local strongmen). There is considerable debate among scholars, however, as to what this literacy meant as well – was it the ability to read kanji and comprehend advanced texts? Most argue that it was the ability to read simple passages in hiragana.