AMPONTAN

Japan from the inside out

Turning up their noses at Chinese seafood

Posted by ampontan on Monday, January 21, 2008

THE WORLD IS WELL AWARE that the Chinese are choking on the polluted fumes they spew daily into the atmosphere, and that the noxious gases they export with their manufactured goods are causing serious health problems, particularly for their neighbors.

Now, reader S.B. sends along this article from the International Herald Tribune, which explains the Chinese have developed a large fish farming industry that has created water pollution problems so severe as to prevent consumers in other countries from eating the exported fish.

The country has become a global fish farming colossus:

China produces about 70 percent of the farmed fish in the world, harvested at thousands of giant factory-style farms that extend along the entire eastern seaboard of the country. Farmers mass-produce seafood just offshore, but mostly on land, and in lakes, ponds, rivers and reservoirs, or in huge rectangular fish ponds dug into the earth.

What has this accomplished?

The government hoped the building boom would lift millions out of poverty. And it did. There are now more than 4.5 million fish farmers in China, according to the Fishery Bureau.

They have gotten gloriously rich in the process:

The boom did more than create jobs. It made China the only country that produces more seafood from fish farms than from the sea. It also helped feed an increasingly prosperous population, a longstanding challenge in China.

Many growers here struck it rich as well, people like Lin Sunbao, whose 25-year-old son is now studying at Cambridge University in England. “My best years were 1992, ’93, ’94,” Lin said. “I only had one aquafarm, and I earned over $500,000 a year.”

That success has come at a heavy price, however:

But that growth is threatened by the two most glaring environmental weaknesses in China: acute water shortages and water supplies contaminated by sewage, industrial waste and agricultural runoff that includes pesticides. The fish farms, in turn, are discharging wastewater that further pollutes the water supply.

“Our waters here are filthy,” said Ye Chao, an eel and shrimp farmer who has 20 giant ponds in western Fuqing. “There are simply too many aquaculture farms in this area. They’re all discharging water here, fouling up other farms.”

The problems are just as enormous as the industry itself:

More than half of the rivers in China are too polluted to serve as a source of drinking water. The biggest lakes in the country regularly succumb to harmful algal blooms. Seafood producers are part of the problem, environmental experts say. Enormous aquaculture farms concentrate fish waste, pesticides and veterinary drugs in their ponds and discharge the contaminated water into rivers, streams and coastal areas, often with no treatment.

Now, no one wants to eat Chinese seafood:

Importers of Chinese seafood quickly caught on. In recent years, eel shipments to Europe, Japan and the United States have been turned back or destroyed because of residues of banned veterinary drugs. Eel shipments to Japan have dropped 50 percent through August of this year.

Do I need to tell you that some Chinese in the industry have found a way to be critical of Japanese behavior?

Some growers have lashed out at Japan, arguing that it keeps raising the drug residue standard simply to protect its own eel farms against competition.

Forgive the Chinese public; after years of government propaganda, they know not whereof they speak. Food safety—particularly for imported food products–is a matter of extreme public concern in Japan. According to an American source:

Japan has been developing the new regulations for more than three years…The new Japanese regulations are based on international standards established by the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization to ensure food safety.

The same source notes that the American pork industry changed its behavior to protect its livelihood, and used the example of the Japanese ban on American beef as a cautionary tale.

Besides, Japanese domestic production of eel, beef, and pork is insufficient to satisfy domestic demand.

In fact, Japanese standards covered more than eel and pork, as this Xinhua report admits:

The new criteria involve 302 food products, 799 agricultural chemicals and 54,782 inspection criteria and is (sic) believed to be the world’s strictest by far.

Xinhua also notes that the standards have had the desired effect:

A ministry spokesperson has promised the ministry would follow Japan’s new criteria strictly so as to guide Chinese exporters. Since 2001, says the ministry, China has suffered 24 major trade and technical barriers hindering its exports of farm produce to Japan.

This is confirmed by Chinaview:

China has resumed exports of grilled eels to Japan after a four-month suspension triggered by reports saying banned drugs had been found in the products. Inspection and quarantine authorities in southern China’s Guangdong Province, the country’s leading eel exporter, said exports to Japan resumed in mid November…Chinese grilled eel products were taken off Japanese shelves in July amid concerns about the use of antibiotics and some banned substances, said Huang Weiming, Guangdong inspection and quarantine bureau vice director. He said Guangdong had not received a single order for grilled eel from Japanese importers over the past four months.

Some misunderstandings still remain, however:

Many Japanese love grilled eels from China. They make up about 80 percent of the market and are sold at prices 40 percent cheaper than similar Japanese products, Huang said.

Here’s how the first sentence should read: Many Japanese love the price of grilled eels from China.

Some Chinese are still blustering, as the IHT reports:

“Our market will expand in Russia and Southeast Asia, and the EU,” Wang said.

I wouldn’t count those eels before they’re hatched. Or at least before reading this from the Wall Street Journal:

The European Union said Friday that it will follow the lead of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which said it is stepping up scrutiny of Chinese farm-raised seafood.
EU authorities in Beijing are talking to Chinese authorities and conducting an investigation, said Philip Tod, an EU spokesman. They have already asked EU countries to increase their vigilance. “We will not hesitate to take action,” Mr. Tod said. “The same substances banned in the U.S. are also banned in Europe.”

Mr. Wang unfortunately has another view:

“In five or six years, as we transfer our export destinations, Japan will be begging us.”

I wouldn’t bet the fish farm on it.

Some observers think the Chinese will get it right eventually:

“Water is the biggest problem in China,” said Peter Leedham, the business manager at Sino Analytica, which advises companies in China on food safety issues. “But my feeling is China will deal with it, because it has to. It just won’t be a quick process.”

I wish I could be so optimistic.

About these ads

8 Responses to “Turning up their noses at Chinese seafood”

  1. john k said

    “THE WORLD IS WELL AWARE that the Chinese are choking on the polluted fumes they spew daily into the atmosphere, and that the noxious gases they export with their manufactured goods are causing serious health problems, particularly for their neighbors…”

    Quality, yet again.

    USA produces 40% more CO2 than China.

    Yes, the world is well aware, just as the world is well aware that the US is far more damaging, “particularly for their neighbours….”

  2. ampontan said

    USA produces 40% more CO2 than China.

    Absolutely incorrect, but why am I not surprised?

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/jun/19/china.usnews

    If you want to learn something–which I doubt–read the following.

    http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/12/11/china-at-bali/

    and

    http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/china-fouling-asian-nest/

    and

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/olympics-city-losing-the-pollution-battle/2007/10/25/1192941241446.html

    and

    http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/china-stonewalls-bad-pollution-news/

    and

    http://ampontan.wordpress.com/category/china/page/2/

    and

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,461828,00.html

    Quality, yet again.

    Ordinarily, I would thank you, but I doubt you would know quality if it walked up and bit you on the ass.

    I have to hand it to you–I don’t think I’ve ever encountered anyone who knew so little yet was so assertive about expressing that ignorance. Especially about Japan. And I’ve met a few.

    I actually felt sorry for you after you blew off Tomojiro and Aceface for trying to clue you in, but you’ve pretty much exhausted everyone’s patience.

    Here’s the deal. Read those links from start to finish. If you still have any objections to this or any of those posts, do so with facts and figures. Do not include your opinion, which, because it is so ill-informed, is worthless.

    It takes all of 15 seconds to mark your e-mail address as spam. Object to this post, or anyone else’s comments, in the same way again, and consider it done.

  3. john k said

    Source: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Centre, et al

    China: 4.15 Billion tons of CO2, as world % = 16.5%
    USA: 5.79 Billion tons of CO2, as world % = 23.1%

    Simple maths here even you could understand, 5.79/4.15 = 40%

    QED.

  4. ampontan said

    Didn’t read them, did you? (But why should you have–you thought a water pollution post was about CO2)

    Very well.

    一件落着

  5. Aceface said

    Just doing the usual cuttin’ and pastin’.

    “Yet when someone asks a question about the same said issues in Japan, the instant retort is to attack other countries rather than answer the question and actually step back and think…yes perhaps this does exist here and yes, perhaps it is not highlighted as much, and yes, perhaps we should listen to others.”

    I thought there was mutual consensus among posters that John K was my game…..

  6. Willie said

    John,

    CO2 is only one of many pollution problems. China is now amazingly polluted. This may change in 20 years, but it’s at a higher level of pollution than, say, Britain or the US.

  7. Martin F said

    Thanks for an excellent post. The Chinese will have to clean up their food production for the sake of their own population, and their workers. Export is the icing on the cake. The real issue will be how to feed their own population and avoid riots.

    UN food standards, by the way, are set by FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius. Governments participate and all decisions are supposed to be based on science. I have attended meetings where Chinese delegations were present, as well as other countries in this region. The only country that comes to the negotiations with any useful scientific data (such as residue limit proposals based on LD50 studies) is Japan. Of course that will change, as China “develops” but until then, they have a lot of explaining to do to their farmers and businessmen.

  8. Martin F said

    To avoid misunderstanding, I should have said, “The only country that comes to the regional negotiations… is Japan.” Of course the U.S. and European Union are also armed with good, solid data at the FAO/WHO level.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 109 other followers

%d bloggers like this: