Japanese whalers to fight back
Posted by ampontan on Wednesday, December 5, 2007
IT’S ABOUT TIME: Japan has announced that its whaling fleet will defend itself during the current Antarctic expedition against those who would use force to stop them (i.e., Sea Shepherd).
If fact, the Japanese are even talking tough:
“We have stepped up measures to defend ourselves from possible attacks, although we cannot disclose any details,” Hideki Moronuki, the head of the whaling division at Japan’s Fisheries Agency, said Monday. “We consider any use of force to stop our legally valid activity as terrorism, and we do not tolerate it.”
One also has to suspect the Japanese realize the world’s media will twist any steps they take on their own behalf, but are finally past the point of caring.
The story is in this AP article carried by the English-language Mainichi.
It will come as no surprise that the AP slants the story. It leads off by saying that the last hunt ended in “chaos”. While the Japanese had problems during the last hunt, the word chaos seems a bit extreme. One of their ships suffered a fire, during which a sailor died, and which left the ship dead in the water for a few days. The fleet conducted its own repairs and made an orderly return under its own power to Japan, however.
This was a big letdown for the media, which was openly cheering for the Japanese to ask a Greenpeace ship to tow it home. Greenpeace certainly kept begging to handle the job, if only to show that their presence in the area wasn’t irrelevant.
The article fails to mention the real chaos involving the two ships operated by Sea Shepherd, which is funded by Hollywood celebrities. They had their licenses revoked because they lied during registration by claiming they were pleasure craft. They were on the verge of being arrested for piracy, and also ran out of fuel.
The story allows Sea Shepherd to have the first verbal salvo by repeating their description of the fleet as the Cetacean Death Star, obviously coined to promote media parroting.
Sea Shepherd’s leader, Paul Watson, has admitted his group’s tactics are designed to attract attention; he correctly observed that the media is more interested in drama than debate. But don’t expect the AP to cop to being an interest group stooge.
The AP mentions the sea battle…
In February, Sea Shepherd ships and a Japanese vessel clashed in the ice-strewn waters of the Southern Ocean. Both Japan and Sea Shepherd claimed their vessel was rammed by the other’s, and the Robert Hunter ended up with a 1-meter (3-foot) gash in its stern above the water line.
…but doesn’t mention the video released by Japan showing the Robert Hunter ramming a Japanese ship (taken from on board the Japanese ship). It also doesn’t mention that ramming is a preferred tactic of the group, which has used it successfully once in the past.
The AP reports what it says are Japanese claims…
Japanese officials said the activists threw ropes and nets into the water to entangle the Japanese ship’s propeller and prevent it from maneuvering, and threw smoke canisters and garbage onto the deck
…but doesn’t report that even Sea Shepherd admitted throwing butylic acid on deck and trying to nail a ship’s drainage ports shut with nail guns.
The AP recalls that two of the Sea Shepherd “sailors” were lost at sea for a few hours…
During the clash, two Sea Shepherd crew members went missing for several hours in a small inflatable boat but were later found safe.
…but forgets that the Japanese whaling fleet helped look for them. (One of the two lost “sailors” said on the group’s website last year that the two things he brought on the expedition were a borrowed iPod and a bicycle.)
Additionally, the AP remembers the objections of the Australian and New Zealand governments…
The confrontation drew protests from Japan, and even sparked strong rebukes from the strongly anti-whaling governments of Australia and New Zealand.
…but forgets that the Australian government found so Sea Shepherd detestable they kept the Japanese fleet informed of the group’s whereabouts.
At this point, it seems as if the AP and the rest will get what it wants: a dramatic confrontation. And frankly, I’m glad to see the Japanese are now willing to stand up for what it perceives as its interests regardless of the publicity, instead of either lying down or lying low.
Now if they would only apply that principle to international politics!
Simon said
I think it’s great that Japan is stepping up its defences. If they injure any crew-member again, it would look even more terrible for them…last year a 27 year old crew member was killed because of their incompetece.
Sea Shepherd exists because of supporters like me, who are willing to use any non violent force to stop this bloody and barbaric, last century practice.
“Steve Irwin” will definately shut down whaling this year, SSCS has new, revised strategies….
Whaling humpbacks, which are part of Australias 300 million dollar whale watching tourism industy is showing no respect for our local jobs and people.
Its time…
Bern said
Whale safari is worse for the environment than whaling due to the fossil fuel and energy which is needed for transporting people to remote places of the world. It becomes odd when countries like Australia says we are against whaling due to environmental reasons yet they do whatever they can to promote whale safari. Sea Sheperd is a violent organisation. A bunch of fundamentalist who got human blood on their hands.
J_ said
Apparently, one crewmember of Japanese whaling boat was murdered by the attack launched by Sea Shepherd. It is amazing that no one is prosecuted for the murder.
For the environment, beef is not any better than whale meat. To raise a cow, if it is grass fed or grain fed, one needs a large field, from which all the wild animals are driven out. Think how many kangaroos there were in Australia 500 years ago, and how many kangaroos there are in Australia now. The decline is due to enclosure of land for raising cows and sheep. Supporting beef diet is like supporting killing wild kangaroos in Australia.
feeonk said
Cetacean Death Star, an accurate description. I hope they really create some chaos this year for the Japanese whalers. Hello? It’s 2007, nearly 2008. I don’t get how you can tacitly support such a barbaric activity. Sure, you have thing for Japan and their customs, but some things need to be left in the past. It’s called compassion and modernity, two traits many Japanese need to learn IMHO>
ampontan said
“I don’t get how you can tacitly support such a barbaric activity.”
I don’t get how you can call it “barbaric”. Please explain. Slaughtering any animal involves unpleasantness, as was shown in the cow slaughterhouse article I put up in another comment thread.
Keeping chickens alive in a modern chicken coop might constitute barbarity too.
J – The Japanese don’t think SS had anything to do with the sailor’s death.
bender said
Now if they would only apply that principle to international politics!
Yep, I’m with this one!
Keeping chickens alive in a modern chicken coop might constitute barbarity too.
Yep. I’ve heard male chicks are selected right after they hatch and powdered into bird feed or fertilizer. What a life, if that may be true.
doinkies said
As long as they don’t kill an extremely large amount of whales, I don’t really care much. But I think that the Sea Shepherd thing is way over the top.
I also find it doinky that a lot of people focus on Japan whaling and mostly ignore the other countries that practice it, such as Norway. And I also don’t like it when people think that every town in Japan hunts dolphins and eats them when it’s actually pretty rare, only practiced in a few places.
I also don’t like it when people condemn all the Japanese because some of the population are whale hunters. One example is this post originally from GaijinPot. -_- As a commenter said there, “People are always willing to gripe about the mote in somebody else’s eye while ignoring the beam in their own.”
Haafu said
If Japan were any other country, the Sea Shepherd folks would find themselves blown out of the water. One only wonders why posters here can talk about “barbarity,” when the Japanese are tolerating obvious acts of piracy with the utmost restraint.
Nelly said
“…A bunch of fundamentalist who got human blood on their hands.”
are you for real??! Give me a break! Sea Shepherd has been around for thirty years, and in that time has neither sustained nor caused a single injury! Pretty unbelievable record. Certainly not one the whaling industry could make!
Stop making excuses for whaling by pointing out that factory farms are cruel.
Yes.
Factory farms are cruel.
I don’t support them. I don’t eat any meat or dairy or eggs that were produced by them.
What’s your f***ing point?
Whaling is horrendously cruel – even more so than factory farming, and that is saying something!!
PLENTY of people who have been on whaling ships have attested to the incredibly horrible, painful, SLOW death that whales suffer at the ends of those harpoons. It takes over 30 minutes for them to die usually (or maybe always – who knows?) and it is incredibly barbaric and painful.
I don’t get your twisted logic, you people. One cruel turn deserves another? I wish wish wish all of you would get shot with one of those harpoons.
ponta said
I am getting to see why anti-whaling is called a religion.
James A said
I’d say ‘cult’ is a more fitting term ponta. These guys are one step away from thinking Kool-Aid and cyanide are good chasers.
Josh said
What a disappointingly low intellectual level of comments, on both sides. Not the place for real debate.
tomojiro said
I am interested when actually this “Cult” about whale did take off in the western societies.
In 1957, Isaac Asimov could still write a SF novel about a future farm under the deap sea in which whales were herded for meat (”The deep Range”).
I don’t think that this will be possible today, without beeing harrassed by members of the “Cult”.
ampontan said
Josh: You can either light a candle or curse the darkness.
You’re more than welcome to improve the intellectual level around here any time.
Bern said
“What’s your f***ing point?”
Why are you acting like an angry imperialist on speed? I am not forcing you to eat whales so you shouldn’t force me to eat them Btw. Do you assult people coming out from Mc Donalds or punch people with leather Adidas sneakers? Did you by chace get bullied in highschool? Let go of your anger.
ponta said
The implication is that you DO eat meat that were raised in a natural condition and were killed in a humane ways.
The point is if you accept the logical conclusion that you wish wish wish wish you would get killed in the same way that the cow and the pork are killed.
And if the point is just the amount of time to take to put the whale to death,(by the way, keep in mind the whale live in a natural condition), the electric harpoon is the answer to this issue.
Now a Muslim does not eat nor kill pigs, a Hindu does not eat nor kill cows, but they are tolerant of other people eating their sacred meat. I’ve never heard of radical Muslim attacking butchers. There are all sorts of vegetarians but many are tolerant of other people eating animal meat.
In a civil democratic society there are many religions, but people tend to hold that you have no right to impose what to eat on other people , based on your belief in what to eat, as long as eating it is not illegal.
bender said
Well, I heard Anglophones (except probably Americans) debate furiously over what the most humane way to kill lobsters is. So someone invented this electro-zapper to fry lobster brains instantly…don’t even care about looking for the source for this one, but I recall reading it in Time magazine.
So, if someone invents an electro-zapper for whales, would it be humane? Or will the anti-whalers provide the whalers with such a device so whaling can be done humanely? I doubt it. It’s probably not about being humane or not.
I know that Americans abhor eating horses, but many Europeans eat them. I heard that you can get horse meat in Canada, too. Now is this an international issue? No, it isn’t.
This “inhumane” argument is ridiculous. If you want the Japanese to stop whaling, better try another approach. Calling them barbaric won’t help at all. If you keep on calling some nation barbaric, it starts to sound like racism. It probably is, for that matter.
Overthinker said
BTW, as a fan of both, I should point out that it was Arthur C Clarke who wrote “The Deep Range”, not Isaac Asimov.
ROK Drop Weekly Linklets - 09DEC07 at ROK Drop said
[...] lengths, but nothing is more ridiculous then this in Japan.- Japanese whalers preparing to fight back against eco-loons. - That’s what the Japanese get for signing on to a treaty based on religious dogma.- [...]
mac said
One interesting factor that the Japanese capitalists involved in the industrialized slaughter of whales are keen to over, as are most so-called capitalists over their area of abuse of natural resources, is the one of “ownership”.
Who do these mammals actually belong to and what rights do they, a far old species than human kind, have they no rights?
In fact, as “pure capitalism” … in theory … involves responsibilities (internalizing externalities … what is the “cost” of replacing a whale or a species?); pirate, thieves or mammonists would be a better name.
… fundamentalist … cult … eco-loons …
Boy, why is it threads on this or meat eating topics attract such arsewipes … are these industry sponsored arsewipes or just volunteer forces for the Center for Consumer Freedom? Would you like fries with your whale steak, beer and cigarettes sir?
dee said
So long as the whalers stick to their hunting limits, and the limits are strictly enforced, there should be no issues.
The Sea Shepherds are skirting the borderlines of piracy.
It should be a given fact that a ship’s crew has every right to defend their property from vandalism, and themselves from being assaulted.
Personally though I’m waiting for the Sea Shepherds to start ramming Inuit kayaks during their Narwhal hunts.
Which group of activists would the hippies support, the Natives or the Greens…
Steve said
Yes,
I totally agree with Captain’s action in the South Ocean. If we do not do something material ourselves whilst the Australian and New Zealand Govt stop short with just talking, Migaloo, as well as other Humpbacks, Minkes ‘ life would be at stake.
If the Japs are so good of talking about beefing up their defences against any disturbances against their whaling activities, I do hope that they understand they are violating all kinds of IWC’s rules against whaling. If the Japs can cheat by saying that they are doing research on whales, prove it and give their evidence. Otherwise, everyone of the world have every right to stop them either by “empty-talk” or taking direct action against them with their own flesh or use of arms ( from our Navy from Australia or those from New Zealand ).
We need to protect our the symbol of Australia, ie. the Migaloo and his family as well as other humpbacks, minkes and other whales. We should not allow hooligans and thugs to do something evil in front of us whilst we are crossing our hands…..
We are always ready to jump overboard to help if we have to….
Steven Soh
Bern said
I personally hope they kill Migaloo and then put a picture on Australia’s most popular news paper front page showing how they are making ecological dog food from Migaloo.
new zealand tourism said
I agree with Bern, those weird eating habits will become news everywhere, I personally don’t like it