AMPONTAN

Japan from the inside out

A moral absurdity?

Posted by ampontan on Tuesday, November 20, 2007

DAVID WARREN THINKS the global warming campaign of environmentalists is a crock comparable previous scares concerning nuclear winter, the population bomb, and global famine.

He also thinks that to:

…”force the relatively efficient and cleanly Japanese to surrender huge quantities of cash in “carbon credits” to China’s dictatorial regime, while also surrendering advanced technology…”

is a moral absurdity.

He notes that:

…”Japan…for ideological purposes…now counts — along with South Korea, Taiwan, and any other technologically-advanced, free Asian countries — as part of the West. Largely bereft of natural resources, these countries built what they have by their own inventive efforts, paying all the way. Mainland China, by comparison, has enjoyed the latecomer’s advantage of massive foreign investment and technology transfer, under the direction of a heavily militarized system of central command.”

The entire piece is here.

While I agree that it is morally absurd, China is indeed fouling the East Asian nest with its pollution, and someone has to deal with all that muck. The Japanese government has apparently concluded that the Chinese (and Indians) are not going to clean up after themselves, as Prime Minister Fukuda is about to unveil a major environmental initiative for Asia this week.

Major Japanese daily Mainichi reported Monday…that Fukuda will unveil an environmental aid package worth US$2 billion over the next five years.
The seed money and resources for Asian nations will go toward the transfer of technologies for clean industries. Japan already gives roughly US$450 million worth loans and grants to China for environmental programs.
Japan’s western coast suffers greatly from air pollution drifting from China, whose industries are 10 times less energy-efficient than Japanese industries, according to the Japanese officials.

Here’s a previous Ampontan post discussing the consequences for Japan of Chinese pollution, and another on a different columnist’s morally (and intellectually) absurd solution.

Those readers who feel the urge to upload a rant about global warming are encouraged to read this, this (and the wealth of links), and this first.

If going through all that material seems as if it might be too tedious, then here’s the best single-shot package. It also has the advantage of providing comic relief.

To conclude, a question: Which do you think will receive more media coverage in the week ahead? The generous Japanese environmental aid package, or the new whaling expedition in the South Pacific?

About these ads

16 Responses to “A moral absurdity?”

  1. Aceface said

    Whales.Ofcourse.

  2. Haafu said

    I don’t believe in global warming. I’m still puzzled as to why Al Gore deserves a Nobel.

  3. JIm said

    - You’re puzzled as to why Al Gore deserves a Nobel??? After he won an Oscar for his great movie, “An Inconvenient Lie”???

  4. bender said

    Japan…for ideological purposes…now counts — along with South Korea, Taiwan, and any other technologically-advanced, free Asian countries — as part of the West. Largely bereft of natural resources, these countries built what they have by their own inventive efforts, paying all the way. Mainland China, by comparison, has enjoyed the latecomer’s advantage of massive foreign investment and technology transfer, under the direction of a heavily militarized system of central command.

    This guy knows nothing about South Korea- how its energy efficiency lags far behind Japan, and talking about major foreign investment and tech-transfer, can’t see much difference between China and SK from Japan’s point of view.

  5. Richardson said

    Excellent links on ‘global warming’ – thanks.

  6. T.K said

    …and for every convincing-looking climate skeptic link, I bet one could find a dozen equally convincing sites that affirm the majority opinion. I won’t wear out your browser, though, since I doubt you’d read them all (just like I only skimmed the ones you posted; after dozens of pages by different authors, you start running into the same arguments time and again).It’s easy to obfuscate and create doubt in a discussion of something this complex. Just never mention all relevant figures and omit some key parts (like methane in the melting Siberian permafrost and undersea hydroxide deposits) and suddenly your argument is a lot more convincing.
    Not all “skeptics” omit willfully. Due to the drive to specialise in the natural sciences, some researchers might not take into account some key features simply because they don’t belong in their respective fields. A similar phenomenon is the abundance of molecular biologists who embrace Intelligent Design.

    You probably know about the lobbying accusations. I’m no conspiracy theorist, but I can see the connection when a decades-old, established model starts getting attacked as soon as money becomes involved.

  7. madne0 said

    My view on global warming (which i’m sure all of you have been waiting for with baited breath) is as follows:
    When the weather man can tell me with 100% accuracy what the local weather is going to be like 3 days from now, i’ll start giving predictions of the global weather patterns in 10, 20 or 100 years some serious consideration.

  8. T.K said

    (above, it should read “hydrate deposits”, obviously. Sorry for the error)

  9. T.K said

    Madne0,

    I can’t tell you how the weather is going to be like a week from now, but I can claim that February will be colder than June. Climate study is not weather study.

  10. Overthinker said

    Mad – ironically, the weather prediction for a hundred years from now is probably sounder than that for tomorrow.

    I personally believe the world is warming, and has been for millennia, a few cold snaps (eg the ‘little ice age’ notwithstanding. The degree of recent warming and the involvement of greenhouse gases etc are more debatable, but it’s not warming per se that worries me but increased extreme weather as the global weather patterns readjust.

  11. Ken said

    Bill,

    I have heard your neighbouring prefectures suffered from opto-chemical smog originated from China this year.
    How about your prefecture?

  12. mac said

    It is wrong to glorify Gore. Fine, his message is good and it is Hollywood enough to penetrate even Middle America. But his real message is still all about power, wealth and the same American dream that is driving this capitalist planetary suicide. I suspected it would happen, and did, when he was outed for using 21 times the amount of energy as the *AVERAGE AMERICAN*, and God knows how many times more energy those average behemoths consume.

    Its not a right message to send out that “it is still OK to be addicted to over-consumption … all it has to be is GREEN over-consumption. Its like coming off heroin but moving on to methadone.

    We have to remember that a large proportion of that Moaist smog heading over the Japan Sea is pumping out cheap goods for the Wallmart and Home Depot. Its source is not China but America and the American economy that is been exported worldwide.

    Sure Japan is wise to protect itself with subsidies, but who is it subsidizing? The consumers of the world who ought to be paying for their pollution.

    Sadly, the real heroes of the environmental movement, the Deep Ecologist, are just too damn tough for the patsies of the Whitehouse or Nobel Institute. Yes, there are a whole bunch of wah-wah ex-spurt paid to confuse the argument and seed minds with confusion. There are billions being spent defending capital from their environmental responsibilities, responsibilities Adam Smith would have been behind shouldering.

    Its call internalizing one’s externalities, one’s external costs that never make it onto the balance sheet .. like the cost of species loss, re-forestation, the suffering on folks driven to live in marginal lands due to multi-national corporate influence etc …

  13. ampontan said

    Ken: It was actually OK. But every spring there is a period when it gets hazy in the air due to the dust storms or desert storms that blow dirt over. It’s more noticeable out in the country than in the town, where I live, however.

  14. bender said

    Once when I was up in Hokkaido, “yellow dust” came over from China and the snow turned into a caramel-like color, which made them melt away fast and that was about it for the ski season. Pretty amazing.

  15. Ken said

    Please be careful for the yellow sand which is absorbing poisnous materials like active carbon.
    The mercury detected in the US turned out from the power plant in China.

  16. [...] Great argument from Japan on the moral absurdity of carbon trading. -  I wonder if OJ was in this van.-  Only in [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 109 other followers

%d bloggers like this: