<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A more muscular Japan?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/</link>
	<description>Japan from the inside out</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ROK Drop Linklets - 12AUG07 at ROK Drop</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7572</link>
		<dc:creator>ROK Drop Linklets - 12AUG07 at ROK Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 02:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7572</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is a list of the 20 most popular English webpages in Japan.- A more muscular Japan?- Just another example of Japanese militarism, Japanese UN peacekeepers may soon be able to use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is a list of the 20 most popular English webpages in Japan.- A more muscular Japan?- Just another example of Japanese militarism, Japanese UN peacekeepers may soon be able to use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aceface</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7345</link>
		<dc:creator>Aceface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7345</guid>
		<description>And JCG did not sink the NK boat.It was self exploded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And JCG did not sink the NK boat.It was self exploded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTC</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7343</link>
		<dc:creator>MTC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7343</guid>
		<description>Ampontan -

1) There is no Japanese Navy.  The naval force is called the Maritime Self Defense Forces.

2) The MSDF did not sink the North Korean ship.  It was the Japan Coast Guard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ampontan -</p>
<p>1) There is no Japanese Navy.  The naval force is called the Maritime Self Defense Forces.</p>
<p>2) The MSDF did not sink the North Korean ship.  It was the Japan Coast Guard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KokuRyu</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7341</link>
		<dc:creator>KokuRyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7341</guid>
		<description>The articles like the one analyzed in this blog post are pretty depressing, especially when most observers essentially lump Japan in with its East Asian neighbours, instead of pointing out that it is the oldest democracy in the region (South Korea has only really been a democracy since 1992), sharing similar ideals and ambitions with other G7 democracies. 

Although Japan has one of the largest defense budgets in the world, its military does not have an offensive capability. Japan has no bombers. It cannot support an expeditionary force necessary to invade or occupy another country. It has no ballistic missiles or nuclear capability. Japan will not even be eligible to receive the Raptor fighter, and will have to make due for the time being with its aging fleet of interceptors.

Probably the most controversial new military capability Japan has is its acquisition of the Aegis ballistic missile defense system. But this is a defensive capability deployed in response to what could really be called a clear and present danger, the threat of nuclear attack by North Korea.

I suppose what people are most concerned about is the movement to change Japan&#039;s Constitution to allow the country to become a &quot;normal&quot; or &quot;regular&quot; country that can resort to war in certain situations.

Personally, I&#039;m disappointed that the current Japanese government has chosen to do this. Why not continue to renounce war? Japan is already a leader in the fight to combat climate change. Why not be a leader in the effort to promote peace?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The articles like the one analyzed in this blog post are pretty depressing, especially when most observers essentially lump Japan in with its East Asian neighbours, instead of pointing out that it is the oldest democracy in the region (South Korea has only really been a democracy since 1992), sharing similar ideals and ambitions with other G7 democracies. </p>
<p>Although Japan has one of the largest defense budgets in the world, its military does not have an offensive capability. Japan has no bombers. It cannot support an expeditionary force necessary to invade or occupy another country. It has no ballistic missiles or nuclear capability. Japan will not even be eligible to receive the Raptor fighter, and will have to make due for the time being with its aging fleet of interceptors.</p>
<p>Probably the most controversial new military capability Japan has is its acquisition of the Aegis ballistic missile defense system. But this is a defensive capability deployed in response to what could really be called a clear and present danger, the threat of nuclear attack by North Korea.</p>
<p>I suppose what people are most concerned about is the movement to change Japan&#8217;s Constitution to allow the country to become a &#8220;normal&#8221; or &#8220;regular&#8221; country that can resort to war in certain situations.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m disappointed that the current Japanese government has chosen to do this. Why not continue to renounce war? Japan is already a leader in the fight to combat climate change. Why not be a leader in the effort to promote peace?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ponta</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7323</link>
		<dc:creator>ponta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7323</guid>
		<description>Japan’s Emerging Grand Strategy*
Richard J. Samuels



&lt;blockquote&gt;China’s current strategic thinking about the region over the coming five
to ten years assumes that the PRC itself will be stronger and more important,
that cultivating good ties with the ROK is fundamental to almost all potential
futures, that avoiding a major break with the United States will remain in
Beijing’s interest for more than a decade to come, and that the two major wild
cards are the future actions of both Japan and North Korea.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://nbr.org/publications/asia_policy/AP3/AP3_NEASecRT.pdf

It might be that the new administration will take measures based on his view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan’s Emerging Grand Strategy*<br />
Richard J. Samuels</p>
<blockquote><p>China’s current strategic thinking about the region over the coming five<br />
to ten years assumes that the PRC itself will be stronger and more important,<br />
that cultivating good ties with the ROK is fundamental to almost all potential<br />
futures, that avoiding a major break with the United States will remain in<br />
Beijing’s interest for more than a decade to come, and that the two major wild<br />
cards are the future actions of both Japan and North Korea.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://nbr.org/publications/asia_policy/AP3/AP3_NEASecRT.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://nbr.org/publications/asia_policy/AP3/AP3_NEASecRT.pdf</a></p>
<p>It might be that the new administration will take measures based on his view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infimum</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7319</link>
		<dc:creator>infimum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/08/08/a-more-muscular-japan/#comment-7319</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Who could have been responsible for it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You can find more or less likely-minded people here:
http://www.jusfc.gov/members.asp
including Jay &quot;I wrote the preface to Ozawa&#039;s book, Nihon Kaizou keikaku&quot; Rockefeller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Who could have been responsible for it?</p></blockquote>
<p>You can find more or less likely-minded people here:<br />
<a href="http://www.jusfc.gov/members.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.jusfc.gov/members.asp</a><br />
including Jay &#8220;I wrote the preface to Ozawa&#8217;s book, Nihon Kaizou keikaku&#8221; Rockefeller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
