Dealing with debtors, Asian style
Posted by ampontan on Tuesday, June 19, 2007
TWO DIFFERENT STORIES highlight two different approaches taken by two countries–the United States and Japan–against the clandestine activities of other East Asian nations actively working against them. From all appearances, Japan actually has an approach, while the U.S. does not.
Writing in Contentions, the blog of Commentary magazine, Gordan Chang takes the Bush administration to task over continuing reports that the Chinese are supplying the Taliban in Afghanistan and Iraqi insurgents with weapons. To provide background, he provides links to other reports suggesting that the Chinese have been providing military assistance and training to the Taliban for several years.
There have also been reports that some people in intelligence circles suspect the Chinese are providing nuclear technology to countries in the Middle East, which I’ve linked to before. Indeed, when Libya’s Col. Khaddafi abandoned his nuclear program and turned over his resources to the IAEA, it was discovered that much of the documentation was written in Chinese.
Chang wonders why the United States lets China get away with it.
In contrast, Japan is dealing with years of belligerent North Korean behavior by cutting off the flow of currency and goods to the Pyongyang regime and refusing to allow North Korean ships to call on Japanese ports. The starving North Koreans make a habit of eating the carrots offered in carrot-and-stick diplomacy—and usually the bark from the stick, too—and then stiffing the joint for the bill. Now (for a change) they’re having to deal with a Japanese hard line, which has been the hallmark of the Abe administration’s Pyongyang policy.

They continue to tighten the screws. Yesterday, the Tokyo District Court ruled that unless Chongryon, the pro-Pyongyang General Association of Korean Residents in Japan, repays a debt of more than US$500 million to the government-run Resolution and Collection Corp., the company may seize their Tokyo headquarters (photo at right). In fact, the ruling allows RCC to act immediately to claim assets.
Chongryon is a pro-Pyongyang group that represents about 50,000 Korean citizens in Japan (most of whom were born and grew up in Japan), and serves as the country’s de facto embassy. They also are widely assumed to act as a conduit for funds to Pyongyang. Some observers think the association now may be forced to dissolve unless it ponies up the money it owes.
Japanese efforts to stop the flow of funds to North Korea are very likely to be causing real pain. The Japanese government officially claims that about US$24 billion flows from Japan to North Korea every year, but since 90% of the money is hand-delivered, no one knows exactly how much is remitted. Some estimates are as high as US$75 billion.
A good chunk of this money is believed to have come from the pachinko industry; many of the gaming halls are run by companies controlled by people born in Japan but with Korean passports. Japanese newspapers have run articles about people cutting back on their pachinko play because of worries it indirectly funds the North’s nuclear program. Another possible North Korean income source is smuggled methamphetamines. But it has become difficult to smuggle out the cash now that Japan is no longer a port of call for North Korean ships.

There’s an unusual twist in the case involving the Chongryun. Shigetake Ogata (photo 2), who attempted to buy the property but couldn’t come up with the money, warned, “This ruling will be conveyed to North Korea and there will be retaliation against Japan, which is not good for Japan’s national interest.”
I think it’s safe to say that Ogata is exaggerating about the retaliation. There is nothing Pyongyang can do economically to harm Japan, and its military options—if it wants to survive—are extremely limited.
It’s also safe to say that Ogata’s involvement in the purchase of the property created a media sensation, as you can see from the forest of microphones. Ogata is the former head of the Public Security Intelligence Agency. That’s Japan’s domestic intelligence outfit, which is responsible for monitoring North Korean activities in the country. In fact, as the Daily Yomiuri reports:
In March 1994, Ogata testified on behalf of the agency at the Diet about Chongryon’s activities. He told the House of Representatives Budget Committee that “about 5,000 members of Chongryon are engaged in secret activities.”
Many in the government and legal profession have spoken of their embarrassment that Ogata would act to help the same organization.
The deal fell through when Ogata failed to raise the funds, but not before investigators questioned him and searched his offices. Ogata held a press conference a day ago, during which he claimed that he became involved because the situation “struck a chord in his heart” and that he wanted to help ethnic Koreans in Japan.
Japanese media reports also note that Ogata told the press conference that Chongryon informed him it gave US$2.8 million yen to an unidentified former president of a Tokyo real estate company to facilitate the deal, as well US$80,000 for Ogata personally as the plectrum to strike his heartstrings.
He denied taking the money, but then again, he also said he was moved by the unidentified man’s stories of having to deal with racism in the U.S. and Japan. Ogata explained that their relationship deepened, and their thinking was alike on certain issues, but that he never got the man’s name card or knew his given name.
In short, Japan’s former top spycatcher claims the reason he was on the verge of being paid by the North Koreans to act as their bagman in a deal to save an organization he knew was trying to harm Japan was that he got taken in by a sob story from someone he didn’t bother to check out. (Would you care to speculate on whether he actually did turn the money down, or would have had the matter not come to light?) He could use the money now, because he’s under investigation for submitting fraudulent documents in connection with the deal.
Meanwhile, the Mainichi Shimbun is reporting that the owner of Chongryon’s Osaka headquarters declared bankruptcy to avoid a similar seizure by the RCC.
Why is it that Japan can put a full-court press on the North Koreans, while the Americans are so loathe to act against China? Among several reasons, this one might be the most important: China is recycling the profits from its huge trade surplus with the United States into U.S. Treasury bonds. That allows the United States to defer its diet and continue its supersized spending—some of which buys goods manufactured in China.
Meanwhile, all Japan has to do is keep finding ways to turn off the spigot while whacking Ogata and any other cockroaches that scuttle across the floor when the lights get turned on.
It’s good to be the creditor, as both Japan and China are finding out.
Addendum: While the Chongryun is affiliated with North Korea, some people in Japan whose loyalties or family ties are with South Korea also actively support the organization or work for it. That’s because the South Korean-affiliated organizations in Japan are emasculated by internal disagreements and are not as effective in promoting the interests of native-born Koreans. Indeed, my upstairs neighbors right after I got married were Korean nationals born in Japan, and the husband worked for the local Chongryun branch (about a 10-minute walk from my house). His wife gave the same explanation to my wife!
bingobangoboy said
Good addendum, but I would also note a minor point — you say “Chongryon represents about 50,000 North Korean citizens in Japan.” Actually, they aren’t North Korean citizens; most of these families emigrated to Japan before the North/South split and their citizenship is “chousen” ([undivided] Korean); the trickle of people who have emigrated from the North since the split are also assigned chousen citizenship. It’s not just a semantic issue; most chousen actually came from the south. I believe that’s actually true of Chongryun membership as a whole, too.
Of course, it’s true that Chongryun’s official stance is strongly and publically pro-Pyongyang.
ampontan said
BBBoy: Thanks for that. That’s what I get for taking a news article at face value. I’ve edited the post.
The Marmot’s Hole » Chongryon to go belly up? said
[...] association of Koreans in Japan. Joshua at OFK has more commentary, while Ampontan examines why Japan was in a position to put the “full-court press” on the North Koreans. This entry was written by Robert Koehler and posted on June 19, 2007 at 11:49 pm and filed under [...]
yasuyasu said
I will speak a place thinking as a native Japanese openly.
It is freedom of individual and emigration nation whether you expect naturalization. At this point Japan is generous with a Korean.
However, will not it be an act of aggression that an emigrant bands together and advocates nationalism of a mother country, and demand the right to vote?There are many weak points in a national system, but I think that it is the cause of confusion to make light of this frame.
I think that Korea race education is Racial discrimination.Korean race education (ethnology school) will be the root of various crimes.
bingobangoboy said
Well then Yasuyasu, you’ll be happy to know that Chongryun opposes zainichi voting. Feel free to send them your donation — better use an express envelope, though.
KokuRyu said
“This ruling will be conveyed to North Korea and there will be retaliation against Japan, which is not good for Japan’s national interest.”
Ampontan, could you remind us what Japan is hoping to gain from putting the screws to NORK? Is it just the abandonment of the nuclear weapons program? Is it realistic to expect that NORK will ever give up its nukes? What is a (realistic) best case scenario for Japan?
Why is it that Japan can put a full-court press on the North Koreans, while the Americans are so loathe to act against China? Among several reasons, this one might be the most important: China is recycling the profits from its huge trade surplus with the United States into U.S. Treasury bonds. That allows the United States to defer its diet and continue its supersized spending—some of which buys goods manufactured in China.
Is it really a fair assumption that there is someone at the top in the US pulling the strings? It seems more likely that there are conflicting interests trying to influence or nudge American foreign policy in the right direction. And perhaps nuclear proliferation (e.g., Chinese nuke components to Libya, etc) or funding and arms for the Taliban are not considered real threats, unless it is convenient (e.g., claims that Iran is supplying arms to Iraqi insurgents).
A little bit cynical, but then again, don’t conservatives and libertarians always say that government is the problem?
Aceface said
“Actually, they aren’t North Korean citizens;”
Well as I understand almost all of Chousen seki’s are considered as 朝鮮民主主義人民共和国の海外在住公民.So I think that will make them
defacto DPRK citizen.
Liberal Japan » Blog Archive » Chongryon issue, Ampontan and One Free Korea chime in! said
[...] Dealing with debtors, Asian style, Anpontan; Like One Free Korea, Ampontan gives a fairly unimaginative, straightforward interpretation of the events. Shigetake Ogata is basically a cockroach who was looking to make a few extra dollars? Is it really all so simple … [...]
tocchin said
“about US$24 billion flows from Japan to North Korea ever year” which means $480,000 per each Chongryun member. Impossible !! At the hight of the bubble economy, the money flow to North Korea was estimated at Yen100 billion(about one billion dollars) ever year.
ampontan said
Kokuryu: Why should Japan fund, even indirectly, anything NK does, particularly when it behaves so badly? Possible reasons: “Don’t tread on me” and regime change.
KokuRyu said
Why should Japan fund, even indirectly, anything NK does, particularly when it behaves so badly?
NK is backed into a corner, and you know how the Japanese say they were always forced into WWII…
All in all, it’s a pretty hopeless situation. How could SK possibly absorb NK without going bankrupt itself? Regime change would seem to be impossible without triggering some sort of catastrophe.
And the NK military seems to be even crazier than Little Elvis, so we can’t even hope for him to die.
bender said
Meanwhile, all Japan has to do is keep finding ways to turn off the spigot while whacking Ogata and any other cockroaches that scuttle across the floor when the lights get turned on.
You sure have the talent to write! I love this part!
I notice that many ex-prosecutors in Japan seem to be corrupt with affiliation with the mob and the like and so are big lawyers who are heavily slanted to the left- which maybe makes them dangerously close to rouge organizations.
tocchin said
KokuRyu: The best scenario would be for China to annex NK. The neighbors as well as North Koreans would be comfortable with the lesser evil. Korea had always been under the Chinese sphere of influence before the Japanese colonial rule. The scenario would stabilize the region for the time being. The eventual democritization of communist Chinal would lead to unification of Korea.
KokuRyu said
The best scenario would be for China to annex NK…Korea had always been under the Chinese sphere of influence before the Japanese colonial rule
I’m telling VANK! Just wait till they get here!
Somehow, I doubt this would be a very popular option for anyone involved…
ampontan said
“Somehow, I doubt this would be a very popular option for anyone involved…”
Maybe the Chinese wouldn’t mind. They’re already playing games with maps on the Internet. And as the example with Tibet shows, resistance doesn’t bother them a whole lot.
bingobangoboy said
“Well as I understand almost all of Chousen seki’s are considered as 朝鮮民主主義人民共和国の海外在住公民.So I think that will make them
defacto DPRK citizen.”
I may well be wrong about this after all; I know it’s common for Chongryun members & chousen to be refered to as “North Korean citizens,” and I don’t think there’s anything misleading in refering to zainichi of North Korean ancestry, or even those who strongly identify with the North as “defacto North Korean citizens,” but I think this is often just a lazy unofficial blanket term for chousen citizenship. I’m still pretty sure that many if not most Chongryun members have southern ancestry, but have nevertheless joined Chongryun for one reason or another.
I’ll concede that with the tremendous decline in Chongryun membership over the past 5 years or so, it might be that most remaining members do have strong personal ties to the North. But I think this isn’t the main reason the government & media generally prefer to call them “North Koreans.”
tocchin said
KokuRyu: None would be a very popular option for anyone involved because there would not be another Japan generous enough to take care of a bankrupt Korea.
Bingobango: The majority of the Chongryun members used to be from South Korea. Now most of the members are North Korean zainichi who have their relatives in NK and therefore cannot dissociate themselves from the Chongryun.
Aceface said
Most of members of Chongyron have bank account in Chongyron related banks that knows the members banking records and financial activities for past decades and many Chongyron members(usually Pachinko parlor owners) are associated with tax evasion under advice(and order) from Chongyron,so that they can financially back up North Korea.Because of the nature of the occupation,which is gambling,it is not difficult to do that (90% of the pachinko parlors are occupied by zainichi Korean.)
And this financial ability had secured the power of director of Chongyron who is assigned directly by Kim Il Son(Later Kim Jong Il himself.)The late chairman Han Dok-Su who was himself a sort of mini Kim Il Song,kept power until his death for building this mechanism.
For that many member of the Chongyron are potentially in danger of being charged as tax evasion
by Japanese authority if there is enough evidence.Usually it is very difficult to obtain such and charge pachinko owners(see Itami Juzo’s “Marusa No Onna”aka”A Taxing Woman” series)unless you get the banking documents of the pachinko parlor from someone inside.And Chongyron could give that crucial papers to the authorities by sending it anonimously.That too has become the tool of the reign of fear under Chongyron.They have done it occasionary to punish their members for not loyal to the directoral board or perhaps too close to J-authority(like talking to Japanese security agent about inside business of Chongyron or recent visit to North Korea.)So all the members are under potential threat of being black mailed
by the very organization they support financially.
Jing said
No wonder American conservatives are making such a mess of things in Iraq, their sheer incompetence is staggering. Quoting one hack Gordon Chang, whose only “evidence” is to quote the überhack himself, Bill Gertz. Gertz posits the presence of Chinese manufactured weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan as “news” when in fact it is quite old.
Chinese munitions in Iraq seized from insurgents have serial numbers dating to the 1980’s. These were leftovers provided during the Iran Iraq war. Similarly, Chinese munitions in Afghanistan are of similar vintage or at the very latest the mid 90’s, being were smuggled into Afghanistan via Pakistan during the Soviet occupation. The HN-5 surface to air missiles and the ability to manufacture them were sold to Iran in the early 90’s.
The only new weapons provided to Iraq in the post-war phase was in 2005. When China supplied the new Iraqi National Army with new assault rifles, ammunition, and body armor.
Whether Iran wants to smuggle in domestically produced variants of Chinese weapons to Iraq or Afghanistan is their own perogative.