<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nanjing deniers in their own words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/</link>
	<description>Japan from the inside out</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JapanNewbie &#187; Comfort Women Deniers take out Ads</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4617</link>
		<dc:creator>JapanNewbie &#187; Comfort Women Deniers take out Ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4617</guid>
		<description>[...] blog Ampontan covers this entire issue in detail, providing many informative links. Especially interesting is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog Ampontan covers this entire issue in detail, providing many informative links. Especially interesting is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ampontan</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4559</link>
		<dc:creator>ampontan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4559</guid>
		<description>Hi, Ken: My grandfather was born in what is now Belarus, but I was born and grew up in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Ken: My grandfather was born in what is now Belarus, but I was born and grew up in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>How d&#039;ye do, Mr. Sakovich?
Guessing from your name, is your root in any Slavonic countries?
Asahi Weekly has taken me here.
Following is another revising movement.
http://www.newschina.jp/news/category_9/child_29/item_3917.html  
Chinese gov&#039;t expressed unpleasant sentiment aganist the establishment of Diet members group to require removing fabrcated pictures from anti-Japan memorial building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How d&#8217;ye do, Mr. Sakovich?<br />
Guessing from your name, is your root in any Slavonic countries?<br />
Asahi Weekly has taken me here.<br />
Following is another revising movement.<br />
<a href="http://www.newschina.jp/news/category_9/child_29/item_3917.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newschina.jp/news/category_9/child_29/item_3917.html</a><br />
Chinese gov&#8217;t expressed unpleasant sentiment aganist the establishment of Diet members group to require removing fabrcated pictures from anti-Japan memorial building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: izanami</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4526</link>
		<dc:creator>izanami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4526</guid>
		<description>Oops, sorry for my misunderstanding.

I see.  You view that the account of the incident, which I take to be (virtually) settled in the biased Western history, has actually been derived from (subjective) criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, sorry for my misunderstanding.</p>
<p>I see.  You view that the account of the incident, which I take to be (virtually) settled in the biased Western history, has actually been derived from (subjective) criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ampontan</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4516</link>
		<dc:creator>ampontan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 06:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4516</guid>
		<description>Izanami: Let me think about what you wrote. Perhaps I expressed it that way because I don&#039;t consider the history settled. (And it probably never will be.)

Thanks for your comments in the other post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Izanami: Let me think about what you wrote. Perhaps I expressed it that way because I don&#8217;t consider the history settled. (And it probably never will be.)</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments in the other post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Izanami</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4502</link>
		<dc:creator>Izanami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4502</guid>
		<description>I guess this time we disagree from the beginning.  I do not think they are &quot;challening&quot; overseas &quot;criticism.&quot;  (This is the sort of rethorical manupulation seen in media, which you sometimes point out.)  What they are doing is &quot;challening&quot; the &quot;settled history.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess this time we disagree from the beginning.  I do not think they are &#8220;challening&#8221; overseas &#8220;criticism.&#8221;  (This is the sort of rethorical manupulation seen in media, which you sometimes point out.)  What they are doing is &#8220;challening&#8221; the &#8220;settled history.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ponta</title>
		<link>http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4492</link>
		<dc:creator>ponta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/nanjing-deniers-in-their-own-words/#comment-4492</guid>
		<description>While I agree with some of their sentiment, I think they are extreme. 
As for Nanjing massacre, in a sense, they contributed a lot to the issue. Shedding doubts on Chinese official claim itself is all right, But if they are trying to give an impression that there was no massacre, I think that is wrong.
I welcome debates on historical issue, and I want to hear the both sides of the story, but, if they are trying to give the impression Japan was innocent on all aspects, I think that is a fatally mistake as well as harming Japan diplomatically. 
It is essential that Japan admit the wrongs she did. 
That said, I think they can not become mainstream.
As Richard J Samuel says
Few mainstream academics, bureaucrats, or national politicians openly associate with the neoautonomists, and many disparage them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
http://www.japanfocus.org/images/UserFiles/File/2439.Samuels.securing/33.1samuels.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with some of their sentiment, I think they are extreme.<br />
As for Nanjing massacre, in a sense, they contributed a lot to the issue. Shedding doubts on Chinese official claim itself is all right, But if they are trying to give an impression that there was no massacre, I think that is wrong.<br />
I welcome debates on historical issue, and I want to hear the both sides of the story, but, if they are trying to give the impression Japan was innocent on all aspects, I think that is a fatally mistake as well as harming Japan diplomatically.<br />
It is essential that Japan admit the wrongs she did.<br />
That said, I think they can not become mainstream.<br />
As Richard J Samuel says<br />
Few mainstream academics, bureaucrats, or national politicians openly associate with the neoautonomists, and many disparage them.<br />
<a href="http://www.japanfocus.org/images/UserFiles/File/2439.Samuels.securing/33.1samuels.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.japanfocus.org/images/UserFiles/File/2439.Samuels.securing/33.1samuels.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
